From CPP: Swipe at the union? HCA promises bonuses to nonunion staff on heels of landmark Asheville vote

Mission Health St. Joseph's building
The St. Joseph’s building, one of Mission Health’s older facilities in Asheville, was formerly home to many services, some of which have been moved to the new Mission North Tower. With the opening of the new facility, the company has not announced its plans for the St. Joseph’s facility. Photo by Colby Rabon, courtesy of Carolina Public Press

By Kate Martin, originally published by Carolina Public Press. Carolina Public Press is an independent, in-depth and investigative nonprofit news service for North Carolina.

The Sept. 17 Mission Hospital nurse union vote in Asheville made national news as the largest health care union victory in the South since 1975.

Hours after what National Nurses United called a “landslide victory,” Mission Hospital’s new owner, HCA Healthcare, sent an email to all employees nationwide thanking them for their role in weathering the COVID-19 pandemic so far.

“HCA has cared for almost 60,000 COVID-19 inpatients, significantly more than any other health system in the country,” the email read in part.

The Tennessee-based company cut costs at the start of the pandemic, including withholding annual raises and temporarily cutting some salaries. Last week’s email announced the return of those wage levels and raises.

In addition, all full- and part-time workers would also get a one-time bonus, the email from CEO Sam Hazen said. Members of the 19 established bargaining units at HCA were excluded. An HCA spokeswoman said this includes the newly formed unit at Mission Hospital.

The timing of the message was calculated, said Alex Kivett-Kimbro, a nurse in the recovery room at Mission, who was among those spearheading the organization effort.

“I think that’s HCA’s way of showing their divisiveness toward the union,” he said Sept. 18.

A bargaining director with the National Nurses Organizing Committee said she expects the hospital’s executives to be in touch with the union by January to start the contract negotiation process.

Contentious process

The union process at Mission Hospital has been contentious from the start, Kivett-Kimbro said.

HCA spokeswoman Nancy Lindell said HCA would review the vote, for which 965 nurses, or 70%, approved.

“In the coming days, the hospital will thoroughly examine the election process and the manner in which the election was conducted,” Lindell said.

Libby Devlin, national bargaining director for the National Nurses Organizing Committee, said both sides of a National Labor Relations Board vote have a seven-day window in which to review the process.

At the end of that time and if there are no problems, the NRLB will then certify the vote, making the union at Mission Hospital official.

After that, the bargaining unit for the nurses will begin collecting information, Devlin said.

“We are going to want to review what the nurses’ concerns are and the demands they want to make,” Devlin said.

“We need to get some information from the employer about what the status quo is, what current benefits do people have, what current policies are in place at the hospital.”

In the coming few months, perhaps as late as January, Devlin said she expects HCA’s team to reach out to the union to start scheduling bargaining sessions.

“This employer is not a pushover,” she said. “We expect there will be some real struggle there. I will tell you the nurses there are ready to engage in that struggle.”

The union effort began more than a year ago, after HCA made a successful bid for then-nonprofit Mission Hospital and its suite of clinics for $1.5 billion.

Shortly thereafter, the new parent company started issuing cuts, which fueled the desire for a union among nurses even more. Nurses accused the company of poor working conditions, with HCA rejecting those complaints, according to correspondence with the state Attorney General’s Office.

The unprecedented vote in an anti-labor state like North Carolina has received national attention, even attracting the attention of Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, who congratulated the nurses for their historic vote via Twitter.

The vote must also send a message to HCA’s top brass, Devlin said.

“The question HCA needs to contemplate is how much do they think they can force onto these nurses?” Devlin said. “They are prepared to stand up in solidarity.”

Throughout the collective bargaining process, federal law says the status quo for pay and benefits must be maintained, Devlin said.

It could take nurses a year or two to ratify a contract, Kivett-Kimbro said.

COVID complications

Earlier this year, the new coronavirus, which causes COVID-19, started circulating.

By March, many hospital companies around the country, including HCA, halted elective outpatient surgeries to prepare for a possible swell of COVID-19 patients who would require acute care.

Those elective outpatient surgeries are the most profitable work most hospitals perform. To compensate for the lost revenue, the company halted annual pay raises, reduced discretionary spending, suspended annual merit increases and cut corporate salaries.

Many workers were told to stay home because of a lack of work, including Kivett-Kimbro. However, hospital workers in that situation were paid 70% of their take-home pay on days they couldn’t work, a policy called “pandemic pay.”

The recent email to workers announced an end to the chain’s cost-cutting measures starting in November. Workers who had their pay reduced will get bonuses that equal half of the pay they should have received, and others will also get a one-time bonus.

However, the email read in part, the restoration of pay and other benefits does “not apply to union-represented colleagues” subject to the collective bargaining process.

Kivett-Kimbro said normally nurses receive an annual 2%-3% cost-of-living raise. He said he’s under the impression that those raises for Mission’s nurses won’t happen this year.

“This action underlines the importance of us having a collective bargaining agreement at HCA because they are able to take away anything they want to, and to give whatever they want and answer to nobody but the shareholders and themselves,” Kivett-Kimbro said.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.