City tries to learn from holiday water outages

UNEXPECTED DEMAND: Independent Review Committee member Ted Tyree explains how numerous water breaks increased the demand for water throughout the city. Screen capture courtesy of the city of Asheville

While it has been over six months since the winter water outage that affected thousands of Asheville residents, several questions still linger over how such an incident could have occurred and how long the remedy will take. An independent review committee found that inadequate preparation for cold weather and a lack of training in crisis communication were the most critical missteps that amplified the effects of the outage.

The nine-member committee was formed in January to analyze the cause of the outage as well as to look at the city’s communications and emergency response. The committee concluded that the incident was largely preventable, in part because the Water Resources Department didn’t quite understand how the Asheville water system functions as a whole.

Outages south and west

Temperatures fell far below freezing from Dec. 23-26, a cold snap not seen since January 2014. The cold triggered a series of waterline breaks beginning Dec. 24, eventually leading to 27 breaks, many on larger distribution lines. Meanwhile, customers’ pipes burst on their sides of water meters, and the leaks sent water demand soaring. By Dec. 26, thousands of customers in the southern and western areas of Asheville had no water.

Even before the breaks, water demand was running about 28 million gallons, nearly 25% higher than average, likely because of holiday festivities. The breaks added to that demand, according to Ted Tyree, a water engineer with the Knoxville Utilities Board and a member of the review committee.

The water system’s rated capacity is 43.5 million gallons on paper, but the demand proved to be too much because of missteps both during the crisis and months before. As pipes were bursting throughout the city, the Water Resources Department had to shut down the Mills River plant, one of the system’s three water treatment facilities, on Dec. 24 because monitors detected particulate levels in drinking water that were close to the state’s regulatory limit. Staff members found the cause to be several clogged chemical lines that purify the water. They also found that components of the filter system responsible for loose particle filtration were frozen and nonfunctioning. According to the report, all of these issues “necessitated time-consuming corrections.”

John Shaw, an engineer with over 25 years of experience in water distribution and a former Asheville resident, gave Xpress his thoughts on how the city handled the crisis.

“Why were those facilities not cold-protected to begin with?” Shaw asks. “There are several things that could have been done, from insulation to increasing the depth of the bury to changing the parent pipe material. This is nothing new and should have been part and parcel of their design.”

Cutting off the south

With the Mills River facility down, the water department ramped up the two remaining treatment plants in northeast Buncombe County near Black Mountain. However, they couldn’t keep up with demand and maintain full pressure and service for the southern and western portions of the system.

On Dec. 26, Water Resources Department leaders decided to isolate most of the southern part of the water system to maintain pressure and service in the remaining portions. That meant even more people lost water service. At a press conference on Jan. 3, Mayor Esther Manheimer said that by cutting off service to the south, the city was able to prevent the whole system from going under a boil advisory.

“At some point, the decision was made to tie off the North Fork (facility) from the south because once Mills River came back online, if you didn’t tie it off, the whole system would have to go under a (boil water) advisory,” Manheimer said. “So, the decision to tie off the south was to basically preserve the rest of the city, so the rest of the city with the hospital system, everything, would not have to go under a boil water advisory.”

On Jan. 5, after being down for four days, the Mills River facility was slowly brought back online.

An elusive valve

Meanwhile, the Candler Knob storage tanks, which are responsible for holding and distributing water to the western portion of the system, were still not refilling as expected.

After several days of trying to find the problem, the water department determined that there must be a valve closed somewhere along the main transmission line that feeds the western storage tanks. After searching for less than an hour, crews found a closed 24-inch valve in the River Arts District on the east side of the French Broad River. The valve was immediately opened, at which time the Candler Knob tanks began to fill much more quickly, which expedited full service.

But staff had known there must have been a closed valve months earlier, according to consultant’s report. After a similar low water pressure incident the summer before, the department hired an environmental engineering consulting firm, Hazen, in January 2022. The only way Hazen could get the modeling to simulate what was occurring with the Candler Knob tanks during periods of high demand was to close a 24-inch valve. Based on that finding, Hazen strongly suspected a closed 24-inch valve existed in the River Arts District just east of the French Broad River. Water department staff members said they looked for a closed valve after Hazen’s report but couldn’t find it.

“Just to be clear, they were already aware of the closed valve,” Shaw says. “They chose to ignore their consultant and not to act.”

Wishful communications

As staff scrambled to restore water service, the Water Resources Department faced intense pressure from city officials to release a timeline to the public for restored water service. The report stated that “frustration over the inability to both resolve the situation, and properly communicate about it, led to direct pressure by the mayor to provide ‘best case’ information to the public over the significant objections of WRD and CAPE [Communications and Public Engagement] staff.”

Additionally, the report noted that there was “a strong insinuation” from the mayor that the jobs of people objecting to the rosy forecast were on the line. Behind the scenes, the water department had no idea when water would be restored but released a statement anyway that said that the department had the “goal” of renewing water services within 24-48 hours. Staff noted during the review that this was an “exceedingly optimistic goal.”

The committee found the unrealistic promise of service restoration to be the city’s most egregious communications misstep. The strenuous objections from WRD and CAPE staff should have superseded the mayor’s insistence that such a message be released to the public.

Kim “Dirt” Murphy, local farm manager and member of the Independent Review Committee, noted in her presentation to the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners on June 20 that she believed that this series of miscommunications was primarily a result of an overall lack of emergency response communication training across the city.

“That is the tragedy in this. I think that if everyone involved, including elected officials, had emergency training, everyone could have stayed in their lanes, and this situation would have never happened, in my opinion,” Murphy said.

Another misstep was issuing an outage map. The city knew that, unlike power outage systems, its meter-reading technology couldn’t provide accurate, real-time outage information.

West Buncombe Fire Chief Dennis Fagnant noted major safety concerns that the lack of an accurate water outage map posed to his department.

“Fire chiefs like myself were using that map to determine what areas in our districts did or did not have water,” Fagnant says. “In this week there were five working fires that West Buncombe responded to, and there is a chance that myself or other fire chiefs would not have been prepared to respond because we didn’t have accurate information as to where we could pull water.”

No immediate fixes

The committee presented 27 recommendations for the city, including an updated crisis communications plan, creating a Water Utility Advisory Panel and implementing the National Incident Management System. It also recommended that the city reevaluate the overall role of the department’s engineering division and hire a production engineer to oversee the day-to-day operations of the water utility.

City Manager Debra Campbell said at the June 16 city council meeting that the city is committed to making the changes but warned the public not to expect any immediate changes.

“I want to caution the community: It’s not going to happen overnight. There’s a lot in this report. And there’s a lot of budgetary considerations that need to be made,” said Campbell. “But we are committed.”

Campbell didn’t provide any cost estimates for implementing some or all of the recommendations.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Chase Davis
Chase Davis is an Asheville-based reporter working for Mountain Xpress. He was born and raised in Georgia and holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science from LaGrange College. Follow me @ChaseDavis0913

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

8 thoughts on “City tries to learn from holiday water outages

  1. MV

    Residents are wise to keep pushing back against mega-developments and expansion of tourism. The people running our city (into the ground) prove again and again that Asheville is not anywhere near equipped to police, plan or provide.

    • Jane Doe

      The city and county management needs to clean house and place qualified individuals with knowledge and understandings of the complex workings to build sound infrastructure and keep it maintained instead of putting people in charge because of their political popularity. We need to replace everyone from the top down starting with the mayor and county manager. Asheville has digressed over the past 13 years, it’s time for a stronger and supported police force and educated officials to manage and run our city and county, not run it into the ground.

  2. joelharder

    The bottom line is the public was deceived. The Mayor said the quiet-part-loud at each press briefing. She firmly stated she is not an engineer, and she is unqualified to discuss engineering findings. I now suspect she was trying to point out the obvious: David Melton is NOT an engineer. I learned Mr. Melton has a B.S. Business.

    I believe Mr. Melton should not be in a leadership position for the Asheville Water System. The urgency in hiring the right expertise is emphasized in the report: the Asheville water system will NOT be able to support our population in 10 years. We have major redesign work ahead of us.

    I can tell there’s a major problem with leadership by reading the new 2022 Water Shortage Response Plan submitted to the North Carolina State Government. Click the link, download, read the policy.

    I want to call your attention to the following: “Customers may calculate a 10% reduction for their household, or business from the water use line printed on all utility bills. Water customers may review their consumption history by logging into their Utility Express Pay account or by contacting Customer Services at (828) 251-1122.” The emergency level is 15% reduction.

    Do you really believe monitoring and enforcement could have been achieved last Christmas? No way!

  3. Bright

    Keyword in the title of this article: “Tries.” This is an admitted failure before the fact. Stock up on extra water, Asheville.

  4. Michael L. Holcombe, Sr.

    The root cause of the water system failure was the absence of the crucial operation of the East Asheville Booster Pump Station. The Pump Station was installed 30 years ago, when North Fork and Bee Tree were the only water production facilities in the system. When system demand exceeded 25 MGD, the Pump Station would operate to restore lost system pressure in the southern and western portion of the water system. Inexplicably, the City abandoned the Pump Station 12 years ago! (When the Mills River water treatment plant was added in 1999, the Pump Station was relegated to a standby mode.) At Christmas, without the Mills River WTP, the system had to rely upon the 36 MGD production of North Fork and Bee Tree. Without the operation of the East Asheville Booster Pump Station, the same system limitations corrected 30 years ago reasserted themselves. Hazen Engineering modeled and proved the operation of the Pump Station would have eliminated the depletion of both the South Buncombe and Candler Knob Reservoirs and no system outage would have occurred. The City Council was told and shown this. Unfortunately, it has eluded the local media.

  5. kw

    This is a major looming crisis. They have admitted that high demand was a huge part of the problem. All development should be halted until our Infrastructure catches up.

  6. joelharder

    The Metropolitan Sewage District was formed as an alternative to manage the water system. This institution is not mentioned in the report. I understand but we need to reconsider the reason. Asheville City Council fought and won their court case to oversee the water system. Debra Campbell is responsible for the water supply of Asheville, Buncombe County, and parts of Henderson County. Ben Woody is the administrative lead. David Melton is the direct lead. No one wants to rock-the-boat.

    I want to share some references:

    I got a good idea on history and trends for population growth, maintenance trends, funds, and shifting oversight over the last couple of decades. The County and city have sued each other, then jointly managed, then gave over assets to one another, then decided the city to manage after a long transition. Our state representatives have gone to State Legislature to call for regulatory oversight. A lawsuit resulting in State Supreme Court decision.

    I want to point out pertinent regulations: persons outside the corporate limits of the City of Asheville shall be entitled to the use of “surplus” water only, and the Asheville City Council “can discontinue water supply any time there is a drought or other emergency, or at any time the governing body of the City of Asheville may deem that the city has use for all of its water supply.” However, Buncombe County is responsible for the maintenance of the pipes to get that water to the city.

    After this disaster, I think it is time to consolidate sewer and water under one dedicated regulatory body. We can pull resources from multiple counties when a disaster strikes. Henderson County didn’t contribute at all, and this water system supplies water to them.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.