If repurposing the obelisk can further balance our demonstrated duality, let’s go for it! Unity Tower sounds good and right.
— Gabriele Rainey Asheville
Thanks for reading through to the end…
We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.
We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to email@example.com
The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.
4 thoughts on “Letter: An excellent way to repurpose the obelisk”
Unity is the antithesis of diversity.
Or in the original Latin: e pluribus unum icksnay.
Enlightened Enema, unity does not mean conformity. Diversity does not mean opposition. They are similar to Ying-Yang, one does not exist without the other.
Should we put up monuments to the 9/11 hijackers or the people who bombed Pearl Harbor as well to achieve “unity” with those people who killed American troops, too? Your premise is based on the belief that yo9u find nothing wrong with people who killed 120,000 American troops in defense of enslaving, torturing and killing people based on their race. Let me guess… you agreed with Benedict Donald that there were “fine people on both sides” in the attack that killed that woman…