Letter: Duke Energy should overhaul energy-efficiency programs

Posted on by Letters
Graphic by Lori Deaton

Like many in Asheville, I support a transition to clean energy. Thus, I joined the Community Engagement Working Group of the Energy Innovation Task Force. The EITF’s’ primary goal is to avoid construction of a new small gas-fired “peaker” plant that would cost a lot but only be used during high energy-demand times. The second goal is to transition to a “cleaner, affordable and smarter energy future,” including renewable energy.

Duke says we need to reduce peak demand by 17 megawatts on dark, cold winter mornings in order to avoid the peaker plant. According to the EITF, the “low-hanging fruit” to tackle first is increasing energy efficiency in both commercial and residential buildings.

Duke has engaged a top marketing firm to build a campaign to get the word out on its existing residential energy-efficiency programs. That sounds good. The problem is that, as they exist today, Duke’s EE programs and website are inferior, confusing and not at all user-friendly. Duke’s EE program rated No. 22 out of 32 utility companies in the U.S. Utilization of the programs is low, and the waiting periods are high.

It has been suggested that Duke license and implement the eScore program, which was highly successful for the Tennessee Valley Authority. EScore is attractive to both homeowners and participating contractors for its ease of use and effectiveness. The integrated online program leverages technology, making the system cost-effective and customer-centric.

It’s time Duke retired its old EE programs and offered Asheville a viable path to meet the required peak demand reduction.

For more information or to get involved with the EITF: http://avl.mx/3p4.

— Debbie Resnick
Asheville

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com
View all posts by Letters →

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Letter: Duke Energy should overhaul energy-efficiency programs”

  1. Marcus Renner

    As a contractor that provides services related to energy efficiency I have to agree, the energy efficiency rebate program could be a lot more streamlined.

  2. TRISH Louden

    I don’t understand why this is not going on in every big city with homeless people I’m pretty sure you have enough money there get a house opened up for homeless to go in and not freeze to death it’s called human decency

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.