Letter: No vote, no voice for Montreat and others

Graphic by Lori Deaton

The 2019 and 2021 municipal elections in Montreat were canceled by the Montreat Town Council. Elected to serve four-year terms, the commissioners voted to cancel these elections and to give themselves an extra unelected fifth year in office. Their stated objective was to change the election cycle from odd to even years. (There are pros and cons to the odd- or even-year cycle, but this is not the focus of this letter.)

The council members could have chosen to hold the elections in 2019 and 2021 with those elected to serve a three-year term in order to move from the odd- to the even-year cycle. This choice was presented but rejected. Instead, the Montreat commissioners opted to simply give themselves a fifth year in office. Black Mountain and Biltmore Forest council members did the same, canceling their 2019 and 2021 elections and giving themselves a fifth year in office.

Asheville municipal elections for 2019 and 2021 were canceled following the request of the Asheville mayor to move the city elections to even years, again with sitting Asheville Council members having an unelected fifth year in office.

Where there is no vote, there is no voice. There can be no justification for the willful and arbitrary cancellation of an election. How would you react if a sitting president of either party, with control of both chambers, encouraged Congress to cancel the presidential election so the president could have an extra year or more in office?

Municipal elections are equally important. Cancellation of an election by whatever means, for whatever purpose, sets an unacceptable precedent and undermines the basic tenets of a democratic republic, a republic to which we have pledged our allegiance. 2019 municipal elections were held by Weaverville and Woodfin [and scheduled for 2021]. It is a credit to these councils that they chose to respect the right of their residents to have council members that serve only their elected terms and did not choose to give themselves unelected time in office.

It has been has observed that the cancellations of elections in Biltmore Forest, Black Mountain and Montreat were “collateral damage” to the cancellation of Asheville elections. Requiring a change in each municipality’s governing charter, bills were introduced in the N.C. General Assembly in February 2019. The bills languished in committee until late May. With less than 24 hours of public notice, Sen. Chuck Edwards brought the now-consolidated charter changes for the three towns to the Senate Rules Committee. (Sen. Edwards does not represent Biltmore Forest, Black Mountain or Montreat.) Sen. Edwards’ bill moved to the Senate and House, where it was passed in each chamber by a simple voice vote. As it was not a role-call vote, there is no legislative record of the individual votes cast by the senators or representatives.

Furthermore, as a local bill, it was not subject to veto or review by the governor. The bill became law on June 17, less than three weeks before the July 5 opening date for candidate filing. Potential candidates were preparing to file. Cancellation of elections at any time, much less only three weeks before the election process begins, is quite simply, simply wrong.

— Mary McPhail Standaert

Editor’s note: Xpress contacted Sen. Chuck Edwards’ office for a response to the points raised in the letter, but none was provided.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Letter: No vote, no voice for Montreat and others

  1. bsummers

    Well stated. But by the same token, those holding office now (and the people who voted for them) might think it’s just as wrong for their terms to be cut short by a year.

    • Mary McPhail Standaert

      NC state law does not allow for the terms of duly elected officials to be cut short, so that was never an option. However, as the change from the odd to the even year cycle did require, by law, a change in each municipalities’ governing charter by General Assembly, the change to the even year cycle could/should have taken place by having the charter changed to also state that those elected in 2019 and 2021 serve a single 3 year term, with following elections to return to the 4 year term. Biltmore Forest, Black Mountain and Montreat councils had that option but chose instead to ask for an extra year in office. Asheville council members and state legislators had over a year to ask for this change, they did not.

  2. NFB

    “Editor’s note: Xpress contacted Sen. Chuck Edwards’ office for a response to the points raised in the letter, but none was provided.”

    Of course not. Baby Doca does not care anymore about what people affected by his decisions think anymore than his predecessor Papa Doca did.

  3. Stefan Stackhouse

    Article I, Section 16 of the N.C. Constitution states that no ex post facto law shall be enacted. I would think that to change a term of office after the office-holder has been elected constitutes an ex post facto law.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.