Commissioners slammed the doors on trust

An overriding issue in the matter of the Progress Energy power plant is representation and trust. While the county manager has authority to explore deals of possible benefit to the county/taxpayers behind closed doors, once a deal is ready to present to the Board, the doors should be opened.

In good conscience and fairness, even if not required by law, the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners should have at least told the taxpayers it represents that the Progress Energy “peaking plant” was under consideration, and should have asked for citizen input way before this was basically a done deal. The land is owned by the taxpayers; the air to be polluted serves the taxpayers; and the commissioners were elected by and are paid by the taxpayers. After the day of the public hearing, there should have been adequate time for public input and reflection before a vote was taken.

It would be interesting to know if the commissioners really understand peak-kilowatt demand and the alternatives to a so-called peaking plant. A number of other electric utilities have addressed this by means far short of building another electric-generation plant, such as by tapping into other electric utilities’ grids and/or requiring large users who contribute significantly to the peak to provide for alternate-fuel or generator cutover when the existing main plant is approaching excess peak. But in no event should the local government—the taxpayers—have to, in effect, give the utility the land on which to build its generating capacity. Progress Energy can afford—and include in its rate structure—the cost of the land. It’s doubtful that this subsidy can be supported by job (and other) revenue that the plant will create for the area. And nothing can justify the additional pollution in this time and place of major concern about pollution.

At this point, the least we taxpayers should demand is to know why we should contribute this land for this private business’ use and accept the additional pollution. And why the Board was reluctant to let us all in on what it was considering before it had made up its collective mind.

Our land, our air, and supposedly our representatives. We should look for better representation.

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Commissioners slammed the doors on trust

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.