Legislature’s focus is askew

North Carolina leads the nation in loss of farmland this century. In our mountains, where escalating land prices and depressed farm profits are pushing family farms out of business, local farmers and the rural communities they support need opportunities to diversify their income. Raw milk is one such opportunity, so it is a shame that your article [“Raw Deal: Consumers Unite to Overturn N.C. Ban on Unpasteurized Milk,” June 20] asserted the conventional public-health wisdom about the safety of raw milk instead of exploring the underlying agricultural issues.

The real question presented by the health, political and economic facts surrounding raw milk is whether North Carolina will actively help family farms survive, or continue to stand on the sidelines while farmland is gobbled up by industrial agriculture and developers’ bulldozers.

Health risks are inherent in our food system, whether the food source is an industrial dairy, a roadside vegetable stand or a deli counter. In most of that system, we impose reasonably effective risk-management controls. Those controls are never 100 percent effective, and as a society we have shown we are comfortable with that level of risk. But in assessing health threats, our government and business leaders show a bias in favor of industrial agriculture. In fact, we can successfully apply more strict standards to small-farm production than [the standards] with which we ask the industrial-ag establishment to comply.

The prohibition on raw milk needlessly denies family farms an economic opportunity. It is unfortunate that our political leaders are debating the arcane legal point of “cow sharing,” instead of [debating] how we create an effective raw-milk regulatory regime (such as the one that exists in South Carolina) that serves the health of the public and of our family farms.

— Roland McReynolds
Executive Director
Carolina Farm Stewardship Association
Pittsboro

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.