Smoke screen: Deciphering the heart of HB2

Milton Ready Courtesy photo

BY MILTON READY 

First, let’s start with a theory that came from a medieval English friar named William of Occam. In Latin, it’s called lex parsimoniae, the law of parsimony, but you probably know it as “Keep it simple, stupid.” Once you shave away all the assumptions and diversionary arguments surrounding a hypothesis, you probably arrive at a larger underlying truth. Now let’s apply Occam’s razor, as this principle is known, to North Carolina’s HB2, the law about bathrooms and transgender people.

To begin with, don’t confuse HB2 with reality. You can troll websites like the state attorney general’s for crime statistics, and you won’t find any instances of transgender individuals entering public restrooms to assault anyone. None. Moreover, transgender people typically avoid public restrooms. Regardless of any set of circumstances, no actual events have occurred.

What you will find is data on hate crimes against transgender individuals in almost any kind of public space, whether it’s a bathroom, school, bar or street corner. You’ll also encounter instances of coaches, priests, ministers, teachers, family members, camp counselors and, yes, even elected representatives assaulting children in bathrooms and elsewhere. So you can shave away any assumptions about security, false virtue or hypocrisy implicit in HB2. Still, these red herrings provide a passionate basis for factual or righteous argument on any number of points — all entertaining but diversionary, part of the law’s fundamental deceitfulness.

You can also ignore all the dismay expressed in media such as The New York Times and by entertainers like Bruce Springsteen about how, with the passage of HB2, North Carolina has retreated into its dark past and blemished its progressive image. In fact, except for a few brief flirtations with the likes of the likes of Terry Sanford, Harvey Gantt and Jim Hunt, North Carolina has always been a reactionary Southern state. Always. Only outsiders think otherwise, and many of them probably live in Charlotte and Asheville.

Don’t forget that North Carolina bled more than any other Southern state in defending slavery in the Civil War, and it waited 50 years before ratifying the 19th Amendment — the one passed in 1920 that gave women the right to vote. In the 1960s, North Carolina was known as “Klansville, USA,” with more KKK members than all the other Southern states combined. Sam Ervin, our iconic senator, should probably be given personal credit for killing the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s, and Jesse Helms, probably the most publicly homophobic senator of our time, was unfailingly returned to office for 30 years. Moreover, in 2012, North Carolina overwhelmingly approved Amendment 1, which prohibited gay marriage.

Now let’s turn to the Bible. North Carolinians always do when there’s a civil rights issue, LGBT being merely the latest. Biblical justifications dot civil rights issues. Ending slavery and segregation? Start with the curse of Ham and Jeremiah. The submissiveness of women? Think Paul here. Against homosexuality? You’ll find legitimization in both the Old and New Testaments. Religious freedom vs. apostasy? Don’t get me started. Yet don’t let religious wrappings, no matter your beliefs, gratify your desire to be “right” or “righteous” on HB2. They can be multiplied beyond necessary, unto frustration.

To discover the essence of HB2, take a close look at the parts that don’t mention bathrooms. North Carolina legislators fear words with trans in them, like transgender, transvestites, transsexual and, especially, transparent. Anticipating that the transgender part of HB2 would be ignored, ridiculed, unenforced and likely struck down by the courts, legislators simply stuck it in as an emotional, red meat issue for the rural voters who back them, all the while hoping that other parts of the bill would either be overlooked or quickly recast in a separate, transgender-free bill. Their weak defense, citing things like “common sense” and “security,” clearly demonstrated that. Afterward, state lawmakers could say they “never wanted to vote on HB2 in the first place” while moving to retain the most essential measures. An exhausted public would hardly notice.

The heart of HB2 lies in the provisions that prohibit local governments from approving anything above the federally mandated $7.25 minimum wage or any anti-discrimination measures, like the one Charlotte passed on behalf of LGBT individuals. Most importantly, the law bars North Carolinians from suing to protest workplace discrimination. But why?

Crafted by rural legislators like Phil Berger of Eden and Tim Moore of Kings Mountain, HB2 perfectly expresses a gerrymandered, artificial hatred for cities like Charlotte and Asheville. It’s the latest iteration of an eternal attempt to eviscerate existing civil rights laws and, yes, a death struggle between rural and urban North Carolina over the state’s future. How best to prevent children from small towns and communities rushing to cesspools of vice and corruption like Charlotte, which lure them with promises of high wages and good jobs? How best to “return” to an idyllic North Carolina that never existed — one dominated by white males, where everyone knew their place and only deferentially complained? Just conjure up a few hobgoblins like LGBTs, pass a new law that creates a false public concern — especially in a presidential election year — and you might be able to ward off the inevitability of demographics and modernity for a few more years. Otherwise, Mount Airy might become Asheville, and Andy Griffith might turn into Caitlyn Jenner.

HB2 stands as a legislative expropriation, for political purposes that embarrassed those it shouldn’t, of the perceived idiotism of rural life in North Carolina. Just as diversity, unlikeness and the multiformity of North Carolina cities like Asheville and Charlotte should be honored, so, too, should the traditional values and closely knit societies of smaller towns and communities like Mount Airy, Marshall and, yes, even Eden and Kings Mountain. Yet HB2 does neither. Moreover, it violates one of the greatest commandments of all, “Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself,” a core requirement for calling yourself a Christian. Sometimes I find that dictum particularly trying.

At its heart, HB2 has emerged as a battle for the very soul of North Carolina. It was never about bathrooms or trans-anything.

Retired UNC Asheville history professor Milton Ready lives in Tryon.

SHARE

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

16 thoughts on “Smoke screen: Deciphering the heart of HB2

  1. James

    Here are some names to Google which should finally shut down this argument that transgendered men aren’t doing perverted things in the women’s bathroom. Jason Pomare of Los Angeles, CA, arrested in a Macys in 2013. Then there’s Norwood Smith Burnes of Rome, GA arrested at a WalMart. And then there’s Richard Rodriguez who was arrested at a mall in Prince William County, VA. That’s just three and there are plenty more cases that can easily be found via a simple Google search. I am so tired of the lies from these anti HB2 jihadists. It is sick and perverted for men to be in the women’s bathroom and that includes trangenders.

    • Bill

      James,

      Besides missing the thesis of Milton’s piece entirely (that HB2 is not primarily about trans issues), you are also not shutting down any argument about transgendered men when:

      a) you refer to them as transgendered men (trans people born with male genitalia are trans women), and
      b) you equate cross-dressers with transgendered individuals.

      • James

        Well according to the Charlotte ordinance which HB2 stopped, anyone of anyone could use any bathroom or public shower/changing room simply because they want to. All they have to say “I think I’m (insert opposite sex) so I have a right to use (opposite sex) facility.” So no, I’m not missing the point at all. That does include cross-dressers like the perverted criminals I named in my reply, as well as men and women who choose to surgically mutilate themselves to become what they think will make them the opposite sex, as well as general perverts who can’t wait to get into the opposite sex’s room with their cell phone camera. This gas-bag, condescending rant by Milton can huff and puff all it wants but it won’t blow down the reality that HB2 is a good, common sense law that the vast majority of sane people support. How’s that Target stock doing by the way?

        • James

          Oops, auto spell check typo… “anyone of anyone” in the first line should say “anyone of any sex”

        • Peter Robbins

          Quote the language in the Charlotte ordinance that produces the result you claim it does.

          • James

            No. I will not waste my time because you’re firmly against HB2 and even if God Himself told you that it was a good law, you’d shake your fist at Him and tell Him He’s wrong. Everyone who is educated about HB2 – for or against – knows that it was written because Charlotte’s ordinance didn’t include language to keep men out of women’s facilities and women out of men’s facilities.

          • Peter Robbins

            Your non-answer would be funny were it not for the fact that the proudly ignorant paranoia it reflects has caused so much harm to our state.

    • Eugene

      Completely support your vision, and many of my friends in San Diego,CA, as well. The most destructve persons are the psychologists in public schools, they provoke kids to think of changing their gender.

  2. The Real World

    “You can troll websites like the state attorney general’s for crime statistics, and you won’t find any instances of transgender individuals entering public restrooms to assault anyone.” — why this is even in your piece, I don’t know. That is not what objections to the Charlotte ordinance have been about and, other than a very few, have I heard or read of people fearing that. Also, turns out you’re a day late — see the Gov’s interview and comments.

    James — yes, there have been some instances but, make no mistake, the biggest threat to the safety of women and children is heterosexual men. It is, indeed, the fact that that ordinance gave an avenue for ANY male to visit the women’s room without repercussion that concerns me.

    And for anyone who wants to read more about the social terrorist organization that engineered this whole thing: https://www.bing.com/searchq=human+rights+campaign+criticism&qs=SC&pq=human+rights+campaign+nc&sk=AS1SC4&sc=8-24&sp=6&cvid=49420CF9C82F48A58933640DAA68E097&FORM=QBRE

    • Peter Robbins

      You, too, Real World. Quote the language in the Charlotte ordinance that says any male can visit the ladies room whenever he wants without repercussion. That is not what Charlotte’s official explanation of the ordinance says.

      • The Real World

        I was recalling the language that you pasted the other day from the ordinance. In my view it was vague and had no real teeth. People will abuse any openings and there need to be better deterrents. You’re splitting hairs here. More importantly……

        At this point, I would think you’d say something on the order of: “this whole thing happened entirely the wrong way, instigated by an entity whose real goals we don’t yet know and they used our state and trans-gender people as their pawns and whipping posts”.

        Please tell me you understand that that’s where we are?

        • Peter Robbins

          That’s not where I am. Where I am is imagining where a reasonable but no-nonsense judge would be if a malefactor tried to use the Charlotte ordinance as a pretext for illegal conduct.

  3. The Real World

    May not have copied link correctly. Used keywords: human rights campaign criticism

  4. 50cal

    Other people’s sensibilities and modesty should be considered here. The whole world dose not evolve around 0.3% of the transgender group. It’s funny, but the Left believes in the rape culture everywhere but women’s bathrooms, locker rooms and showers. How convenient for Leftists to pick and choose their moral outrage. As they are given a pass for their ginormous hypocrisy.

    The author of this article, is like all Leftists and media, (but I repeat myself) … they only give partial truth. Checking the FBI stats, there have been NO, NADA trans assaults of any kind. So the Charlotte ordinance was a solution looking for a problem. It was all about, moving the lgbT, agenda further along.

  5. mesolith

    Milton’s theory on the true agenda, rural vs urban, is a real stretch in my opinion. It is painfully obvious he is obsessed with denigrating our state and it’s history, as every piece he offers is filled with negativity and disdain. This will be the last of his offerings I will read.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.