127 Hours

Movie Information

The Story: A fact-based story about Aron Ralston, who chose to cut off his arm rather than die when he was trapped by a boulder in the walls of a narrow canyon. The Lowdown: A harrowing, brutal, yet ultimately life-affirming film from Danny Boyle. It's virtually a two-man show -- director and star James Franco -- and one of the movies of the year.
Score:

Genre: Fact-Based Drama
Director: Danny Boyle
Starring: James Franco, Amber Tamblyn, Kate Mara, Clémence Poésy, Treat Williams, Kate Burton
Rated: R

Awards season heats up as the first of Fox Searchlight’s two heavy contenders, Danny Boyle’s 127 Hours, hits town this week. (The second, Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan, opens on Dec. 22 locally.) The short take: Everything you’ve probably heard about the intensity of Boyle’s film is true, and the film is at least so near being as good as has been claimed that it makes little difference. If it seems at all ever so slightly disappointing, that’s probably because nothing Boyle could do at this point is going to quite live up to Slumdog Millionaire. In every sense, however, 127 Hours is masterful—even brilliant—filmmaking.

Boyle’s film is drawn from Aron Ralston’s book Between a Rock and a Hard Place, which recounts Ralston’s experience of getting his forearm trapped between a boulder and a canyon wall during a solo hiking trip he undertook without alerting anyone to where he was going. The end result, as most of us know, was that Ralston ultimately cut his own arm off rather than die in that crevice. It is this story that Boyle and his co-writer Simon Beaufoy (Slumdog Millionaire) have turned into a film, and somewhat surprisingly—since we know where the story is going—it makes for compelling and even suspenseful entertainment.

The film works on the assumption that we know what is going to take place during those titular hours and carefully sets up just how—and to some degree why—things go wrong the way they do. We see Aron (James Franco) get ready for his wilderness hike. We see him in preparation for the trip. We see him just miss—and not take the time to really look for—his Swiss Army Knife. We see him let his answering machine catch a phone call from his sister—and we see him ignore her request to call his mother and let her know where he’s going “because she worries, but you know that.” Through it all, Aron proceeds in his self-contained, self-absorbed manner—something that’s stressed on the drive to his starting point as he revels in his solitariness. All of this works as well as it does, in part, because we know where it’s going.

The same is true of his encounter with two girls (Kate Mara and Amber Tamblyn) he meets on his hike. He spends a little time with them, shows them a hidden lake, makes very vague plans to meet up with them at a later party and then goes on his way. “I don’t think we figured into his day at all,” one of them remarks after he leaves. And, of course, they didn’t—no one did. But what Aron also hasn’t figured into his day is the accident that’s waiting just ahead of him.

Once the film reaches the accident with the boulder, it’s easy to assume that things are going to become both claustrophobic and limited—and it’s hard not to wonder if all the hyped action of the opening, with its split-screen multiple images, was to make up for this. The truth is something very different, because if anything, the film becomes freer and more fluid once its hero finds himself trapped. After establishing the narrow (literally) world that he now inhabits and the limitations it imposes, Boyle enlivens the proceedings with memories—most of which reflect some aspect of realization that his current predicament is an unnecessary event stemming from Aron’s self-containment. As time passes, the memories alter into hallucinatory fantasies that occasionally feel a bit like something out of a David Lynch film—or at least they carry something that smacks of that Lynchian sense of genuine madness.

All of this, of course, is leading up to the film’s—the story’s—key sequence where Aron cuts off his arm with nothing but one of those dull, tiny blades on a cheap multipurpose tool. It’s harrowing. It’s gruesome. It’s intense. And I have no trouble at all believing that the stories of some viewers passing out while watching the scene are not just studio hype. What is surprising, if you really watch the scene, is how little is actually shown—despite a good deal of blood—and how much is conveyed through sound, suggestion and editing. Realizing this, however, does nothing to make the sequence any easier. I’ve watched it twice and it’s no easier to keep from looking away the second time. I don’t think it ever will be.

But the sequence itself isn’t the point of the film, which is, at bottom, a journey of self-discovery about the nature of isolation—whether deliberate or accidental. The film’s actual key scene occurs a few minutes later when Aron stumbles on some hikers. Even at this point, he has to force himself to admit something he has spent his entire life avoiding. It is the most moving moment in the entire film—and the complete justification for everything that has come before. You must see this movie. This is filmmaking. Rated R for language and some disturbing violent content/bloody images.

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress since December 2000. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

8 thoughts on “127 Hours

  1. Dread P. Roberts

    Wow! Now that I’ve read your review – and knowing your past reservations for this film – I’m much more excited to see this. An exuberant Five stars from a claustrophobic critic, who’s not a big fan of Franco… that’s got to be saying something.

    What did you think of Franco’s performance? Is it at all on par with the pre-Oscar hype that it has recieved?

  2. Ken Hanke

    What did you think of Franco’s performance? Is it at all on par with the pre-Oscar hype that it has recieved?

    I’d say it’s that good. I don’t think he’ll win, though, because the voters are likely going to want to make it up to Colin Firth for not giving it to him last year. I haven’t seen The King’s Speech yet, but I’m betting Firth is likely to get an Oscar for it. The trailer bears out the probability. Now, if only the Weinsteins would decide what they’re going to do with it…

  3. Dread P. Roberts

    I don’t think he’ll win, though, because the voters are likely going to want to make it up to Colin Firth for not giving it to him last year.

    …And Firth damn well deserves that Oscar, regardless of what movie it’s for.

    On the other hand, Franco is co-hosting the Oscars, so there might be a little bit of favoritism showing up there. We’ll see.

  4. Dread P. Roberts

    I recently saw a rather interesting interview with Colin Firth talking about The King’s Speech, and his approach to the subject matter. Firth seemed very passionate and serious about the role. It was actually rather moving.

  5. Ken Hanke

    On the other hand, Franco is co-hosting the Oscars, so there might be a little bit of favoritism showing up there. We’ll see.

    It’d be interesting. Has a host ever won?

  6. Ken Hanke

    If it was favoritism, it was done before anyone saw Love and Other Drugs.

  7. Sean Williams

    I have no insights to contribute, but I thought I’d just mention that I think Danny Boyle is just about the only contemporary director who could make a thriller about a man trapped under a rock for five days.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.