McCullough wins Court of Appeals seat in round three

North Carolina’s first statewide instant-runoff race finally has a winner. Judge Doug McCullough, who formerly served on the Court of Appeals from 2001 to 2008, edged current Judge Cressie Thigpen by a mere 0.62 percent in the recount of the IRV tally of second- and third-place voter choices. Thigpen, who originally led by some 100,000 votes in the general election’s first-place tally, lost ground in the second-round IRV count and requested a recount. He conceded the race yesterday when the unofficial third-round results showed ballot totals of 543,980 to 537,325.

In Buncombe County, the recount tally gave Thigpen 17,812 to McCullough’s 13,008. According to the Buncombe County Board of Elections’ Ben Bryson, the third-round inspection gave each candidate between 20 and 30 additional votes. North Carolina became the first state to use the IRV ballot-ranking method when 13 candidates filed for the Court of Appeals seat that became available too late for a statewide primary. (For additional information on the race, see “Close Call.”)

In a media advisory today, election-reform think tank FairVote reported that North Carolina State Board of Elections director Gary Bartlett said there were no major problems with the IRV count and that the new method gave voters a chance to participate in picking the winner. “Whether you like it or not, it worked,” he was quoted as saying.

— Nelda Holder, freelance for Xpress

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “McCullough wins Court of Appeals seat in round three

  1. Joyce McCloy

    FairVote’s primary objectives are to promote instant runoff voting and also proportional representation. They also sell election “consultant” services and recommend voting vendors.

    None of us can say for sure how the vote tally went, because we don’t have the data needed. The state used error prone uncertified software to tally IRV, the IRV votes were not counted at the polling places but later counted at central locations, and the audit data we were able to obtain is confusing and not consistent.

    Did voters use IRV? Did they understand it? All we have is anecdotal evidence, because we the public are not allowed to see the ballots. Unlike in other IRV jurisidictions, North Carolina won’t release the vote or ballot data that shows how voters marked their ballots for all 13 candidates.

    For 13 candidates, we know the first round choices, but we only know the 2nd and 3rd choice votes for Thigpen and McCullough. For all we know neither would have won if the other votes were considered.

    What we do know is that 48 days after the election we have a “winner” who pulled up after being 100,000 votes behind. Both Thigpen and McCullough each ended up with approximately 28% of the vote. About 800,000 voters were effectively shut out of the “runoff” election, because out of 13 candidates, they didn’t vote for Thigpen or McCullough.

    Thigpen went from 537,445 to 537,325, or down by 120 votes. McCullough went from 544,023 to 543,980 or down by 43 votes. McCullough won by 6,655 votes (including IRV). I’m basing this on numbers from data at NCSBE site on Dec 13 http://awesomescreenshot.com/0244s72d1 and Dec 20 http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/NC/22803/41813/en/summary.html

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.