Letter: This is no way to build a city

Graphic by Lori Deaton

Last month, the Asheville City Council voted 5-1 to approve the conditional rezoning of the property located at 767 New Haw Creek Road. The vote signals the latest tortured step in this unpopular 84-home development.

During the meeting, no meaningful questions were asked by the Council. Details went by unchallenged. Assertions were made and left as fact. Revelations came to light and left in darkness. The outcome was predetermined.

Community concerns about bridge viability, infrastructure improvements, road safety and stormwater runoff were all dismissed. Residents were left to wonder who lived in the affected area, so off base were some comments by Council members.

Precisely how access to the property will be granted remains unresolved. For months, Mr. Kevin Jackson has circled the land searching for a cheaper way to enter the property after his profitability numbers took a hit following the need to build a pricier bridge over the wetlands.

When all seemed lost, the Haw Creek Community Association (HCCA) stepped in to save the day. The HCCA offered entry via a property in an adjoining neighborhood. Like so much in this sad saga, just how they planned to accomplish this remained unsaid.

What is certain, however, is that there is currently no legal right to build a road through this property. Every party involved is aware, but the vote happened anyway.

Yet, one thing is for sure. The HCCA will not be part of the campaign moving forward. They ceded any right to continue by the secretive way they negotiated with Mr. Jackson. The final plan promoted by the HCCA had no broad support or mandate from the community they claim to represent.

To be clear, the residents surrounding this property would have supported Mr. Jackson’s right to build houses. If only the Council had taken the time to find out how out of touch the HCCA was with its residents.

The approval process is broken. If saner heads had taken responsibility much earlier in the process, a better solution would have been derived. The Council twists all of its strategic plans in knots to justify an outcome that leads to more houses.

The mayor summed up the meeting by saying she voted for the development even though she doesn’t believe it will ever get built. This is no way to build a city.

— John Appleby
Asheville

Editor’s note: Xpress reached out to the Haw Creek Community Association with the letter writer’s points, and we received the following response from HCCA President Chris Pelly: “I agree with the writer that the development campaign in Haw Creek has divided some within our community. Most residents, however, understood this was a complex issue that sought to balance neighbors’ concerns with the demands of a growing city. Ultimately, most residents considered the outcome a reasonable compromise.

“When details of the proposed development were first revealed in late 2023, HCCA convened a working group open to any interested residents. Many chose to participate, and four conditions were identified to achieve community buy-in. With leadership from Mayor Manheimer over multiple negotiating sessions, developer Kevin Jackson finally agreed to the community’s conditions.

“Late in the game, a small group of neighbors, some of whom declined participation in the working group, demanded additional negotiations and called for delaying the City Council vote a fourth time. As negotiating conditions had already been met, the City Council chose to proceed. For more details, please visit our website [avl.mx/e16].”

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Letter: This is no way to build a city

  1. MV

    The mayor’s statement is most curious. Why spend so much time on projects lacking the proper infrastructure and ingress/egress in this town? Why not verbalize why projects are problematic and might not get built (or might get built even if highly problematic) and admit that citizens are right to oppose certain (but not all) housing proposals?

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.