Asheville considers $4M for I-26 Connector aesthetics

Asheville city seal

The Interstate 26 Connector project has been a saga more than 30 years in the making — as well as a persistent source of community frustration and the butt of a recent Xpress cartoon by Brent Brown. The next chapter of that story comes Tuesday, Feb. 14, as Asheville City Council weighs whether to commit to nearly $4 million in aesthetic treatments for the project.

This new funding would come on top of more than $1.4 million the city has already budgeted for bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure along the I-26 corridor. A staff report on the item does not identify a source for the money but says it would be allocated as part of a future capital improvement plan.

The top three priorities to be supported by the funds, as outlined in a December report compiled by the city’s I-26 Connector Aesthetics Committee, would be the Bowen Bridge, the Haywood Road Bridge and the Hill Street/Hillcrest bridges. Five other areas, including Patton Avenue east of the Bowen Bridge and Riverside Drive, would also see improvements. The N.C. Department of Transportation would be responsible for the remaining cost of the work, as well as any unexpected budget increases.

Examples of specific projects include new multiuse paths over the Bowen Bridge, historic markers and safety lighting on pedestrian bridges. The Aesthetics Committee recommended nearly $5.9 million in total city spending; it’s unclear what improvements were left out of the $4 million recommended by city staff.

Selection of a contractor to complete work on the areas covered by the Aesthetics Committee report is currently slated for mid-October.

141-unit development floated for New Leicester Highway

Council will also vote on a conditional zoning application to allow a 141-unit senior living development on a currently wooded 4.9-acre lot at 157 New Leicester Highway. The complex, proposed by Cohen-Esrey Development Group of Merriam, Kan., would consist of one four- or five-story apartment building and roughly 150 parking spaces.

Of those units, 28 would be made available at rents affordable to residents earning 80% of the area median income ($45,000 for an individual or $51,400 for a couple) for a guaranteed 20 years. Half of the affordable units would accept federal vouchers. In exchange, the developer is seeking nearly $1.69 million in property tax rebates over 16 years through the city’s land use incentive grant program.

Consent agenda and public comment

The consent agenda for the meeting contains 11 items, which will be approved as a package unless singled out for separate discussion. Highlights include the following:

  • Adoption of the city’s revised Water Shortage Response Plan. A staff report accompanying the plan notes that the city will increase water production at the Mills River Water Treatment plant under drought conditions to preserve its main reservoir at Burnette Lake; city officials have blamed failures at the Mills River plant for recent water outages over the holidays.
  • A revision of the city code to strengthen regulations around wildlife feeding. The new rules would specifically prohibit activity that attracts bears and give a broader range of city staffers authority to enforce the ordinance.
  • A resolution scheduling public, in-person briefing work sessions for Council. The new meetings would take place at 11 a.m. on the first and third Thursdays of each month unless otherwise specified. Mayor Esther Manheimer confirmed with Xpress that the work sessions will replace Council’s current system of private “check-in” meetings.

Council members will gather in their chambers on the second floor of City Hall, located at 70 Court Plaza, starting at 5 p.m. The meeting will be carried live on Charter/Spectrum Channel 193 and livestreamed through Asheville’s public engagement hub and on the city’s YouTube channel. Members of the public can also listen live by calling 855-925-2801, meeting code 3906.

Prior to the regular meeting, Council will hold a work session in the same location at 3:30 p.m. to discuss potential funding for McCormick Field. As previously reported by Xpress, the ownership group of the Asheville Tourists minor league baseball team is seeking $30 million from the city, Buncombe County and the Buncombe County Tourism Development Authority to pay for upgrades to the facility. No documents regarding the discussion were available as of press time.

Those who wish to speak during the regular meeting must attend in person and sign up at the door. No live remote comment will be permitted; no comment of any sort will be permitted at the McCormick Field work session.

Prerecorded voicemail messages can also be left at 855-925-2801, meeting code 3495; written comments can be sent to until 9 a.m. Feb. 14. General comments for City Council can be sent at any time to

The full meeting agenda and supporting documents can be found here.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Daniel Walton
Daniel Walton is the former news editor of Mountain Xpress. His work has also appeared in Sierra, The Guardian, and Civil Eats, among other national and regional publications. Follow me @DanielWWalton

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

5 thoughts on “Asheville considers $4M for I-26 Connector aesthetics

  1. Pierce

    When are water system fails again, you know why. Lack of investment while they spend money on worthless projects that benefit 1% of the population. Before they commit, maybe they need an outside consultant.

    • Walter Sobchak

      They’re a bunch of clowns.*

      *My apologies to all clowns for the comparison.

  2. Lou

    Seriously? With potholes lining every street, trash all over the roadways, homeless sleeping in the woods, and service worker morale at an all time low? Asheville is gonna spend MORE money on a highway that has already stolen millions in tax dollars? Wow, the lunatics really are in charge of the asylum. What a horrible lack of leadership in this country and specifically here in Trashville.

  3. Mike Rains

    Water system piping upgrade is not “sexy” but unless this City starts a very aggressive replacement program, major water line breaks that threaten large service areas will become more commonplace in our near future. Most American cities are behind the curve on their pipe replacement programs: Asheville, due to its sordid financial history is “way behind the curve”. Start catching up now and in an aggressive manner or face the consequences in the years ahead.
    Spend the $4M on water main replacements not on these “nice to have” features around teh I-26 interchange.

  4. kw

    And stop the $30million giveaways to wealthy white developers, baseball team owners and manufacturers of F-35 components. The Asheville business model is the stupidest thing I’ve ever seen.

    Resident taxpayers need: water, clean air, law enforcement, better roads, other infrastructure…extra housing and whoring for tourism should move to the back of the line.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.