Battle lines being drawn: Amendment One has passions flying

Against: Liz MacNeil, the Coalition to Protect All NC Families regional field coordinator, with two volunteers and a stack of pledges by people to vote against Amendment One. Photo by Max Cooper

“Constitutional amendment to provide that marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State.”

On May 8, North Carolina voters will decide whether to add the above language to Article XIV of the state constitution. Titled “Miscellaneous,” the article mostly deals with less controversial matters, such as specifying the state’s capital and geographic borders.

But the appearance of those 27 words on the primary ballot represents the culmination of a protracted struggle by Republicans and religious conservatives to get an anti-gay-marriage amendment. For years, the Democratic leadership that dominated the N.C. General Assembly wouldn't let the measure out of committee. That all changed in 2010, however, as the GOP claimed a majority in both chambers, and Amendment One began rolling toward a vote.

Although state law already prohibits same-sex marriage, North Carolina is the only Southern state that hasn’t enshrined such language in its constitution. This reflects both Tar Heel politics, which are generally less conservative than those of our neighbors, and a Democratic reluctance to give their opponents an issue they could rally around. But this is still the Bible Belt, and some churches, along with local GOP organizations, are pushing to make the amendment law.

“In several states same-sex marriage has been imposed upon the people by courts that have engaged in tortured judicial reasoning," House Majority Leader Paul Stam declared in a written defense of the amendment late last year. "These courts have used the state constitutions to reverse the very pro-marriage policies that were in effect when the state constitution was adopted.

"Now it’s happening in North Carolina," he continued. "Same-sex couples in Asheville went to the courthouse for two weeks last fall seeking to obtain marriage licenses. … This marriage amendment will ensure that marriage between one man and one woman will be protected from result-oriented judges."

Meanwhile, North Carolina’s demographics have shifted significantly over the years, with growing (and increasingly visible) LGBT communities across the state and major cities — including Asheville — approving domestic-partner benefits and even endorsing same-sex marriage outright. An array of LGBT, civil-liberties and other groups opposing the measure have come together as the Coalition to Protect NC Families.

And as the decisive day approaches, both sides are marshaling their forces, ramping up their efforts, and preparing for a battle that, whatever its outcome, will be one for the history books.

Impact uncertain

Although Amendment One is often referred to as a same-sex-marriage ban, its potential ramifications are far broader.

To begin with, the state legislation creating the amendment includes another sentence, added to address private businesses' concerns about their own employee benefits, that won’t appear on the ballot: “This section does not prohibit a private party from entering into contracts with another private party; nor does this section prohibit courts from adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to such contracts.”

On March 31, speaking at the Buncombe County Republican Party convention, state GOP Chair Robin Hayes declared: "All [Amendment One] does is keep the law as it already is. … Don't be fooled by Democrats putting out misinformation that it does anything else."

But that's incorrect. Although it will fall to the courts to sort out the ramifications if the amendment passes, it clearly goes far beyond merely adding an exclamation point to existing state law.

Last November, four University of North Carolina law professors produced an extensive legal analysis of the amendment’s potential impact. Far from simply fortifying existing law, they asserted, it would strike down local ordinances and prohibit any form of domestic-partner benefits.

They also said the amendment could drastically roll back things like visitation rights and domestic-violence protections for unmarried heterosexual couples.

“It is impossible to predict definitively how broadly courts would interpret the Amendment’s prohibitions, given its vague and untested language,” the report states. “However, two things are clear: First, it will take courts years of litigation to settle the amendment’s meaning. Second, when the dust clears, unmarried couples will have fewer rights over their most important life decisions than they would have had otherwise.”

But Stam, who’s also an attorney, produced his own analysis, asserting that visitation rights, private contracts and domestic-violence protections would not be affected. “There is a real threat to the institution of marriage,” he concluded.

Still, even critics like Stam and the North Carolina Family Policy Council acknowledge that the amendment would eliminate local domestic-partner benefits — such as those the city of Asheville now offers its employees — and civil unions.

“This marriage amendment would recognize only domestic legal unions between one man and one woman,” Stam’s website notes. “Domestic partnerships or civil unions, whether opposite-sex or same-sex, would not be valid or recognized here.”

Strange bedfellows

The fight over Amendment One has led to some unusual alliances.

The Coalition to Protect NC Families, for example, doesn't just include leftist and Democratic groups, but also the state Libertarian Party and a number of churches. Some business executives have also condemned the measure as harmful to the state's economy.

Republican notables are divided as well. Former Charlotte Mayor Richard Vinroot opposes the measure, as do U.S. Rep. Renee Ellmers and John Hood, president of the John Locke Foundation.

Still, many GOP leaders actively support it, including Speaker of the House Thom Tillis, though he’s also predicted that it will be repealed within 20 years.

Meanwhile, not all Democrats oppose the measure: 11th Congressional District candidate Tom Hill supports it, asserting in a recent debate that gays “have a genetic problem.”

Marching as to war

With one of the highest percentages of same-sex couples in the country according to census data, Asheville has been a focal point throughout the debate. But while city voters are likely to oppose the amendment, much of the rest of Western North Carolina is rural and more conservative — precisely the kind of area pro-amendment forces will have to carry to win.

The two sides are handling things quite differently on the ground. In many counties, the local Republican Party is leading efforts to promote the amendment, with some support from churches and conservative advocacy groups such as the Family Policy Council, the National Organization for Marriage and the Civitas Institute. The Vote for Marriage NC initiative is making some effort to coordinate the push, but no single organization is comprehensively managing the campaign statewide. Some Republican leaders have even sought to shift the focus to other issues: In the same Buncombe County speech, Hayes advised candidates to focus on jobs and the economy instead.

But while many Democratic politicans have denounced the proposal, it’s the Coalition to Protect NC Families that’s the driving force behind fundraising and organizing to defeat the amendment. The group kicked off its statewide “Race to the Ballot” campaign in Asheville in January. Since then, volunteers have raised money, held events, run phone banks, collected pledges and coordinated get-out-the-vote efforts.

Asheville native Liz MacNeil, who returned to the area to serve as the coalition's WNC regional field director, says she “hasn't had a day off since Jan. 24.”

“We've been talking about the harms … to women, children, unmarried couples (both same-sex and heterosexual) should this amendment pass,” MacNeil reports. “We've been educating the public. We're finding a lot of people here in Buncombe haven't heard of Amendment One or don't know the ramifications. Once they do, they're pretty strongly against it.”

On April 10, the Asheville City Council is set to approve a resolution declaring the city's opposition to Amendment One.

Meanwhile, the Buncombe County Republican Party is heading up local efforts to pass the amendment. A March 22 announcement from local party Chair Henry Mitchell declared: “Buncombe County voters will have the opportunity to forever preserve the definition of marriage in our State. As the only Southern State left that has not done so, we are finally getting the opportunity to take this to the people.”

In the same statement, Mitchell also promises that the party “will be actively working to get out the YES vote for this amendment.” He did not respond to requests for further comment.

— David Forbes can be reached at 251-1333, ext. 137, or at


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

5 thoughts on “Battle lines being drawn: Amendment One has passions flying

  1. Gary James

    All the passionate arguments, pro and con the bible, or religion, or sexuality or whatever really comes down to this: You don’t amend a constitution to DEPRIVE people of their rights. Amendments have been to give women the right to vote, end slavery, try to stop you from drinking a beer, then repealing it when it was a bad idea. Do we really want to be the last southern state to join the rest of them going backward? Or, does North Carolina want to continue to be progressive and show the rest of the country that “The South” doesn’t have to be synonymous with bigotry and oppression? Since the GOP legislature has decided to waste thousands of dollars of your money to ask this question, show them you know what’s going on and you vote “no” because it’s a bad amendment. Period.

  2. Debi Drecksler

    The foremost champion of Amendment One in the general assembly is Rep. Paul Stam (R), the Majority Leader of the state house.
    My son, Jason Wunsch (D) is running against Paul Stam for N.C. House of Representatives, District 37.
    Jason is a graduate of A.C. Reynold’s High School (class of 92′) and past President of Mars Hill College Student Body (class of 96′)
    I thought this would be of interest to our local community!

  3. Vaughn

    It would seem bigotry and discrimination are still fashionable among many in the South, as well as in government. Likely, the people in favor of this amendment also secretly support the return of interracial marriage bans, and undoing women’s ability to vote.

    What will happen if we allow same sex marriage? The USA will not collapse, marriage will continue as an institution, and everything will be fine. Nothing will change, except more same-sex couples will be happy and have equal treatment under the law.

    The only thing dangerous about allowing same-sex marriage is that it will disprove all the preposterous claims that conservatives make.

  4. Just Me

    Another poster said:

    “Likely, the people in favor of this amendment also secretly support the return of interracial marriage bans, and undoing women’s ability to vote.”

    I would add to that list non-Christain marriages/civil unions and those otherwise ‘living in sin’ as the additional intended targets of this legislation.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.