Council opts for $5.9M in I-26 aesthetic improvements

BUILDING BRIDGES: Council agreed to the full $5.9 million recommended by the I-26 Connector Aesthetics Committee in a unanimous Feb. 14 vote, but members said finding additional community partners such as Buncombe County and the Buncombe County Tourism Development Authority would be necessary to help pay for the work. Rendering courtesy of the city of Asheville

The Interstate 26 Connector project will not only make I-26 wider for vehicles, but it will also make the corridor more attractive for anyone passing through. That beauty will come at a cost to Asheville taxpayers: about $5.9 million in new spending, as approved unanimously by Asheville City Council on Feb. 14.   

The “aesthetic treatments” approved as part of the package include improved lighting, safety railing, pedestrian and bike surfaces and monument pillars. Asheville has already budgeted about $1.4 million for bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure along the I-26 Connector route, bringing the city’s total allocation for the project to $7.3 million. 

The N.C. Department of Transportation would be responsible for the remainder of the work’s cost, as well as covering any unexpected budget increases. The selection of a contractor to complete the project will begin early this year, with a decision expected by mid-October.

The spending approved by Council matches the full amount recommended by the city’s I-26 Connector Aesthetics Committee in December. City staff, however, had pushed to limit the aesthetics spending to about $4 million. 

The reduced scope would have omitted stamped and colored concrete sidewalks at the Haywood Bridge Interchange and bridgehead monuments and stamped concrete surfacing on the Bowen Bridge. Asheville Transportation Director Ken Putnam explained that the staff’s recommendations for cuts arose due to “numerous competitive needs” in the city’s budget and limited funding sources. 

“We realize that the price tag for all of the improvements recommended by this committee is not insignificant,” said committee Chair Ted Figura in a presentation to Council.

“The aesthetic improvements that we are asking the city to fund will not only improve the pedestrian and bicyclist experience and their safety, help remediate previous injustices inflicted on vulnerable neighborhoods and further the city’s vision for extending the downtown westward,” Figura continued. “We believe that they are also valuable placemaking initiatives that will enrich Asheville’s character [and] not only contribute to the quality of life enjoyed by Asheville citizens — it will add to the attractiveness of our community for tourists.” 

Members of Council agreed to support the higher level of spending, but they said that finding additional community partners such as Buncombe County and the Buncombe County Tourism Development Authority would be necessary to help pay for the work. No source of funding has yet been specified for the new I-26 commitments. 

At the behest of member Kim Roney, Council also voted to support I-26 aesthetic recommendations made by neighborhoods that will be directly impacted by the project, including Burton Street, Montford and Hillcrest. Documents outlining those recommendations weren’t attached to Council’s agenda.

Council member Maggie Ullman was the sole vote against Roney’s motion, saying that she didn’t feel comfortable offering her support without first seeing specifics from the neighborhoods.

“I’ve got to be clear with everybody — I love Burton Street. I think Burton Street is fantastic,” Ullman explained. “I feel a little caught off guard not having written materials to consider. I support the neighborhood, but the lack of precision and detail makes me uncomfortable.” 

Council shuts the door on check-in meetings

Council also voted unanimously on a resolution replacing its current system of private “check-in” meetings with public, in-person briefing work sessions. The new meetings would take place at 11 a.m. on the first and third Thursdays of each month in City Hall’s first-floor North Conference Room.

According to a Feb. 15 city press release, the first of the new meetings will be held Thursday, Feb. 23. No public comment will be accepted. An agenda for each meeting will be posted online no later than noon the day before.

“This is another opportunity to capture the story and tell the story of the hard work that we’re doing, the challenging issues and the successes that we’ll share together when we do the people’s work in public,” said Roney. “So, thank you for the effort to schedule these meetings in public. And follow us on the journey as we try this new effort.”


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

8 thoughts on “Council opts for $5.9M in I-26 aesthetic improvements

  1. indy499

    Council just can’t stop spending $ on our virtually non existent bike community. You can literally walk around for DAYS and not see a single bike. The added congestion on various streets, eg, Hilliard, Merrimon, etc is appalling. Hope somebody is getting some serious payola for this stuff.

    • Froscari

      Indy. You must be blind. There are cyclists everywhere in this town. Open your eyes. If you don’t, you might run over someone.

      • SpareChange

        I live downtown, and am out and about, either on foot, or in a vehicle, almost daily – especially around N. Asheville. In my experience, recreational bikers are fairly common in some neighborhoods, on Sunset Mountain, and around some places like that. However, the much touted bike lanes intended more for commuting (on Charlotte, Merrimon, and increasingly criss-crossing all parts of downtown) are virtually empty. I believe it is those ghost-bikers, and the dedicated bike lanes on otherwise busy through streets, that the comment is directed at.

        • indy499

          I have literally never seen a bike on Hilliard and the elite bike lobby got the bike lanes put in which totally disrupt traffic. They aren’t even safe if a biker ever showed up because the new lanes require crossing the unused bike lane to make turns.

          • Dylan

            Was Hilliard ever any faster moving? I lived on South Grove years ago and it wasn’t any different then. There’s been plenty of development on South Slope — maybe that’s the culprit? I find sidewalks much safer on the roads that have bike lanes, and for that I’m thankful.

        • Froscari

          Ok Indy, since you’ve never seen a bike on Hiliard then that’s the only criteria you need. You’ve not seen one, so they do not exist. Well, I have seen cyclists on Hilliard and it’s not the “elite bike lobby” which I assume (never safe to make an assumption, I know) you think are people in spandex riding expensive bicycles. Those god awful Prius/Tesla driving liberal “elites” that aren’t “real” Americans in your eyes. I see regular folks in normal clothes using a bike as a means of transportation. Maybe they can’t afford a car or pay to park downtown or missed the bus. Who knows, but I bet they’re thankful to have a bike lane and have an alternative to Asheville’s inadequate public transportation. Sorry its such an inconvenience for you, we all know how important you are. Also, using the word “elite” is an easy way for you to blame people that you know nothing about. I guess you got that from watching Fox News? And for the record, I think the road diet on Merrimon doesn’t work for cars or cyclists. Charlotte St is a different story however, and is greatly improved with the bike lanes and the 3 travel lanes for cars. I agree with Dylan, roads with bike lanes feel safer for pedestrians.

  2. MV

    Could some money be spent on Pearson Bridge? Not safe to walk, often backed up due to jack-knifing trucks, plus so many pot holes and surface crumbling. It need not be gorgeous, just some common sense consideration for Public Safety.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.