Letter: Corporate free rides

Graphic by Lori Deaton

The article “Controversial Choices: Debating the Pratt & Whitney Project” [Jan. 20, Xpress] ignores the fact that the corporate welfare scheme is in desperate need of reform. Do cheerleaders for corporate welfare even talk to the victims of the freeloading companies? Such as the people who say they were fired for serving on a jury only to find that the county and state don’t enforce the law against firing jurors? The people who may have been disabled or may have had relatives killed by a dangerous workplace so a company can spend the money on executive perquisites instead of safety?

The term “revenue neutral” was used in the Pratt & Whitney deal to mislead people into thinking the county is somehow getting a free lunch. They’re just shuffling numbers and hoping we can’t do math. Taxpayers are in reality paying for the deal, and so we have every right to hold them accountable.

Everyone who spends money in the county benefits the economy and pays sales tax. By the Economic Development Coalition’s logic, every person is therefore entitled to a revenue-neutral tax deal.

The argument was made that if we put conditions in the incentive contracts, a company may not sign. What then is our incentive to give them our money? Fix the failed scheme and put the following requirements in writing for the companies getting our tax dollars:

1. Pay a decent living wage to all employees, as opposed to a deceptive average wage achieved by giving most of the money to managers. Not just vague, unverifiable promises of “community prosperity,” but specific numbers for each job.
2. Hire only people from the county paying for the bailout.
3. Forfeit the incentive cash if a company fires people for serving on a jury, since no government agency enforces that law. Don’t tell the victim to pay a lawyer to enforce the law. We already pay taxes to have the law enforced.
4. Forfeit the incentive cash when a workplace is so dangerous that an employee is killed on the job. …
5. Conduct a yearly confidential survey of all employees (not just managers) and require a 70% approval to get that year’s incentive cash.
6. Ban the dishonest, unethical requirement that employees sign a statement allowing a company to take money out of an employee’s personal checking account.

The trickle-down economists (corporate lobbyists) will say these regulations would kill jobs, but they can’t say how to bring back people who were killed on the job because of deregulation.

If the companies don’t want conditions, then they can raise their money through a GoFundMe page instead of forced reverse-Robin Hood socialism for the rich. Companies may lobby to lower the bar by not including conditions. Trying to avoid improvement is self-defeating.

Our highly skilled young people know how to use the internet to find better jobs elsewhere. After they’re gone, we won’t be able to attract any company.

The argument was made that there was not enough opposition to stop the Pratt & Whitney deal. Convenient excuse, since they pulled a fast one and gave the opposition only a few days’ notice. There was even far less support for the deal. How many counterprotesters were downtown demanding we give a free ride to Pratt & Whitney?

— Brennan Green


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Letter: Corporate free rides

  1. Jonathan Greene

    Revenue neutral is a laughable term. The county thinks revenue neutral is the tax rate stays the same. Revenue neutral is where the tax rate is figured so no bill increases and the revenue they received previously is what they receive. Not a penny more. The county will squeeze every cent out of you it can while it pays top dollar for unqualified management and wastes money by the millions. You’re still paying for the criminals who stole money and barely served sentences who got retention pay! That invoice comes twice a year every year for the citizens to pay for!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.