Letter: Hoping Supreme Court requires fair district maps

Graphic by Lori Deaton

North Carolinians should take a look at the new maps created by the Republican-controlled legislature. In the proposed maps, the state House district line runs down the middle of my street. So the neighbors at the block party, the Fourth of July celebration, who watch my house when I’m away — who share concerns about traffic and irresponsible pet owners — they’re in a different House district.

In the maps, the districts resemble diabolical Rorschach inkblots. A three-judge panel (controlled by Republicans) determined the maps to be a partisan gerrymander that favored Republicans. Despite this, the panel declined to intervene, saying, basically, “Nothing about redistricting affects a person’s right to cast a vote.” In other words, you can still vote, even though it doesn’t mean anything.

That decision has been appealed to the state Supreme Court. I hope that it will require that the maps be redrawn, as the Supreme Court did in Ohio. Apologists for gerrymandering complain that nobody knows what a fair map looks like. They are wrong. We do.

These days, there are mathematical models to evaluate how well maps reflect the population. A fair map would closely mirror the political leanings of the state overall. It is wrong for politicians of either party to create maps that serve themselves rather than their constituents.

The best approach would be to convene a nonpartisan commission to draw fair maps, as has been done in several states. I believe these gerrymandered “safe seats” are a primary cause of the partisan rancor and division we are seeing. We need elected officials and representatives who serve all of their constituents.

— Cinda S. Chima

Editor’s note: Multiple news outlets reported that the N.C. Supreme Court struck down the voting maps Friday, Feb. 4, in a 4-3 decision. “The Supreme Court said the maps ‘are unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt under the free elections clause, the equal protection clause, the free speech clause, and the freedom of assembly clause of the North Carolina Constitution,’” wrote Reuters. Republicans must submit new voting maps by Feb. 18, noted WRAL.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.