Letter: Locked out at Duke rate public hearing

Graphic by Lori Deaton

I am puzzled and perplexed by what happened at the public hearing on Duke Energy’s rate hike request before the North Carolina Public Utilities Commission on Sept. 27. The meeting took place at the Buncombe County Courthouse, scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. Beforehand, activists were outside on the plaza, peacefully demonstrating with signs and speakers. A little before 7 p.m., a stream of people entered the hearing room, and the meeting began. It was a good turnout, but the room was not full. There was plenty of extra seating.

Several hours later, well into the hearing, one of the people testifying stated that the outside doors had been locked at 7 p.m., and people showing up later were not allowed to enter. That was news to us.

When the hearing ended at 10:45 p.m., after more than 40 speakers had finished testifying (all speaking against the 16 percent rate hike), another person and myself asked the police why people were not allowed in after 7. They said the meeting room was full; the fire marshal’s limit was 180. This was puzzling, as I doubted 180 were in the room. There was still plenty of seating, and I have been to a hearing in that courtroom before where every seat was taken and people were standing, lined up along the walls and crowded in the back.

So I asked a Public Utilities staffer if there was such a fire marshal limit, why not hold the public hearing in a larger venue? The reason given was that the courthouse was where they could have adequate security.

Then I spoke with City Council member Julie Mayfield, who stated that she was locked out and was escorted in only after she texted Jason Walls of Duke Energy, who was in the hearing, and asked to be let in.

I left the building puzzled. In all the public meetings I have attended, I have never been turned away for coming in late, and in the instances where the room was full, people were at least allowed into the building or into a room with a video feed. So the question: Who ordered the police to keep people out after the meeting started? Why was the public kept out of a public meeting?

Follow-up led to the conclusion that it was the Buncombe County sheriff who made the decision to close the building to latecomers. Was this directive legal, keeping the public out of a public meeting at a county building? From now on, let’s be vigilant. Let’s make sure our public officials keep public meetings open to the public.

— Carol Stangler

Editor’s note: Xpress contacted the Buncombe County Sheriff’s Office for a response to the letter, but Sheriff Van Duncan did not reply by press time. Also, Xpress’ news department was still awaiting information from the Sheriff’s Office about how it handled public access to the meeting as well. See the Sept. 28 online post “WNC Residents Rail Against Duke Rate Hike” (http://avl.mx/45t).


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Letter: Locked out at Duke rate public hearing

  1. Bill Garrity

    There might be an explanation. I gave a scathing testimony two days before in Raleigh on the 25th. Rather on focusing on the spill and the rate hike, I talked about the conflicts of interest of the NC Utilities Commission and the blatant hubris and corruption surrounding Duke Energy and the NC government.

    Here’s what happened at the Snow Hill and Wilmington hearings:

    As a result of this, Chairman Finley decided to change the rules and bar public testimony at the final hearing in Raleigh on November 20.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.