Letter: On the edge of brilliance

Write to Mountain Xpress
Graphic by Lori Deaton

I feel honored to have been one of 17 Asheville folks who worked through a 10-month review of the city’s Haywood/Page public space, a much-maligned and jumbled-up area sliced through with too many streets and odd intersections in front of St. Lawrence Basilica and the civic center. The task of this advisory committee came down to recommending, based on a gargantuan amount of citizen input, exactly what most people wanted and envisioned as occurring in this undeveloped area, roughly 1.3 acres that have defied organization into anything worthwhile for more than a decade.

To put it another way, the idea was to “tee up” for qualified (and hopefully brilliant) designers, yet to be named, how most people felt about the space, plus notes on topography, pedestrian and traffic flow and other phenomena confronting a sensitive design process. Moreover, the team was asked to develop a core vision for how the area will work and what it could eventually mean as an inspirational destination for residents and visitors.

A concern that I have personally had throughout the process is that whatever “view” congeals, it should provide an unmuddled interpretation for the design team, the exact reverse of trying to be “everything for everybody.” In other words, the primary proposed uses of the space should be clear as a bell, not pulled down with innumerable options, as in “well, we could do this” or “we could do that.”

On that basis, and taking into account the overwhelming majority of citizen responses calling for an open (parklike or green) space with multiple open-space uses, I think it was clear to everyone on the team that “passive/active” open space has ruled the roost of everyone’s thinking from the very start.

Any trouble in the henhouse, so to speak, for any and all parties involved seems to have arisen over the words “education,” “housing” and “retail” as small bubbles that wound up affixed to the idea of an active open area.

For what it’s worth, and strictly speaking as an individual, I believe these words are not only poorly chosen, but incredibly distractive to a central concept for the space.

I saw them, all along, as peripheral and down-the-line tangential to building a fabulous open space, conceivably with gardens, paths, fountains, trees, views and public art.

So, I truly believe it’s time to put the accent on the right syllable, as my mom used to say.

And the accent should be on breathtaking, inspirational beauty, on community, on relaxation and wonder. Education may be an ad hoc book club meeting in the open space under a tree, housing in an extremely complementary way could develop well down the line beyond the edge of the park and retail, drawn to the beauty of the space (but not within it), would naturally provide opportunities and fill some needs without defacing the inherent beauty of a gorgeous space.

So I’m simply asking that we all raise our expectations. At one point in time, Central Park was a dream, as was Bryant Park and the High Line, all in Manhattan. These great spaces (linear in the case of the High Line) were not built out of a muddled view or any effort to compromise the uplifting value of a breathtaking space. They were built with the notion: Do it right, do it for the long term, and all the rest will come, not the least of “all the rest,” meaning an enduring love for an intricately thought-through space turned into something of sure merit by masters with a clear vision.

The worst thing we could do, especially after all this consideration, is to lower the sights of what this space could be and especially try to make it a space that includes something of everything. That is not how great spaces work.

I was asked to help write a “sense of place” vision statement as part of the report for [the] Council presentation. One of my favorite lines reads:

“Whenever I walk into this space, changeable and fluid with the seasons, it’s like a curtain rising on one of the city’s most consequential and beautiful urban spaces.”

Let’s not stop until that dream comes true.

— Jay Fields
Member, Public Art and Cultural Commission
Asheville

 

SHARE
About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Letter: On the edge of brilliance

  1. Don

    thank you for your service and commitment and community mindedness… not to mention your “vision” …wish I had it. When I pass by the Haywood/Page public space I only see a parking lot… then and now. Any “park like” space -with [an] education, housing and/or retail “components” thrown in seems fetched at best. That, and even the least bit of “park like” space there will be almost instantly overwhelmed by our unfortunate homeless folks (and the way things are going in our lovely Trumpian world/reality…. there will only be more of them/us). But again, thank you for your civic leanings. Hate to have to say this… but, let’s just get it over with and cut to the reality of it…. it’s prime real estate for another hotel. It’s a very small parcel and up it the only way to go with it. Anyhoo, I’m quite sure the city could use all the subsequent revenue(s) -every bit of it- from the sale of it… sigh.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.