Letter: Why have land-use plans if they can’t be counted on?

Graphic by Lori Deaton

Plans, while not always binding, provide a blueprint, a framework for government and private citizens on which to base decisions about their futures and their finances.

What is the point of envisioning the future if, when the future arrives, the plans are changed and can’t be counted on? People lose trust.

I don’t pretend to know all the details about [the 101 Charlotte St.] project or its timelines, but I do know no one is saying, “Don’t do this project.” The request is to keep it within the scale of the neighborhood, keep the tree canopy, save the historic homes, honor the environment and City Council’s climate-change pledge, consider and respect the investments already made by the people City Council represents and abide by the Charlotte Street Overlay, the Neighborhood Plan and the Charlotte Street Corridor Plan.

The proposed plan is a “big city” entrance to one of the two historical neighborhoods in Asheville. It is wrong on many levels, and it will set the stage for the overcommercialization of Charlotte Street. I imagine Dr. Killian would not have approved of this development as proposed.

The general attitude of government is, if developers follow the rules, they can then proceed with their project or can request a change of the rules to accommodate their special needs. While conditional use requests are legal, they are often abused and overused. The UDO has been tweaked to the point that City Council no longer provides sufficient public participation and oftentimes doesn’t control the proceedings.

We should create incentives for developers to reuse properties that are deforested, already covered in concrete, not be held hostage to tax breaks and payments to comply with our rules. If we want to help, we can help with demolition of abandoned buildings and properties for reuse.

Cutting down trees and paving parking lots is not climate-change-sensitive, as City Council has pledged to be. If Asheville can’t be a standard-bearer for being the change we want to see, then who can be? A frightening thought.

To me, the saddest part about this protest is, it is not a NIMBY protest. The taxpayers and the Preservation Society have never said, “Don’t build here.” It has always been about saving Charlotte Street. And preservation can create many jobs. When you preserve nothing, you lose everything.

This is a defining moment for the future of Asheville and for the legacy of City Council’s service. Do you say, “Enough is enough” or do you say, “Our neighborhoods are up for grabs to the highest bidder”?

— Leni Sitnick

Editor’s note: This letter was written before the 101 Charlotte St. project developer withdrew a request for conditional zoning for the project and submitted an application for a smaller project in its place.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Letter: Why have land-use plans if they can’t be counted on?

  1. Enlightened Enigma

    Hardly a defining moment and the legacy of THIS city council is far overshadowed by the supreme lack of sound leadership.

    WHY do elected democrats destroy ? WHY ? They have nearly destroyed Asheville this time…

    BUT, the best news today is that Cathy Ball is LEAVING !!! Question IS, WHY would Johnson City WANT such non leadership from Asheville for their city manager ?

    Isn’t it curious that Cathy Ball did not wish to wait her turn for Asheville City Mgr when Debra retires… What does that tell us ?

    • Enlightened Enigma

      Enlightened by direct experience … but I am amused by your response …

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.