Letter writer: City should reconsider Biltmore Avenue site for substation

Graphic by Lori Deaton

The Sparks Fly article in the last issue [“Sparks Fly: City Struggles to Locate, Regulate New Electrical Substations,” Aug. 3, Xpress] was well-laid-out and informative. There were some statements however, that should be debated and clarified. If the Western Carolinas Modernization and Expansion project was truly a “modernization” project, then Duke Energy Progress would not be trying to cram 100-year-old, air-cooled, ugly substations into the downtown urban core. They would use more modern technology and design that encased the substation in a building with a small footprint, using gas-insulated substation technology.

Second, there is no data to back up the statement by company spokesman [Tim] Pettit that a gas-insulated substation has a tenfold increase in costs. Readily available literature states that the cost may be twice as much, but property savings somewhat offset that cost. Duke has $16 million invested in property around Asheville that they could resell and use the difference to put in a modern substation. The Hilliard site is “a densely populated urban area.”

The city has removed two other sites that are more suitable to installing the old “not modern” air-cooled substation from discussion. Both the Matthews Ford site and the Isaac Dickson site would have allowed a 100-foot setback from the substation and even 50 feet of vegetation. One of the city’s justifications per Mayor [Esther] Manheimer is “that you can’t have a tax-credit-financed redevelopment within 500 feet of a substation.” This is not true! The source of funding for the tax credit for the Lee Walker Heights redevelopment is “LIHTC.” The 2016 Qualified Application Plan for LIHTC states that you get six points if not within 500 feet of a substation, but there is no prohibition. This information is easy to access, and hopefully the city will drop that justification.

If you read the Lee Walker development plan, it does not require the Matthews Ford site for anything other than Phase 2. Phase 2 has nothing to do with the redevelopment of Lee Walker. Phase 2 promises to bring small retail, some market-rate housing, some subsidized housing, a parking garage, etc. The city does not need more retail along Biltmore Avenue. Phase 2 is all about providing a developer with prime real estate to build more commercial space along a primarily medical corridor.

The city should allow Duke to build the substation at the Matthews Ford site if Duke insists on “not modern” air-cooled substations. It will not create a public eyesore that is seen constantly by residents and tourists!

— Betsy Sterling


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Letter writer: City should reconsider Biltmore Avenue site for substation

  1. Lulz

    LOL, the city was going to shut off the water supply to the power station a few weeks back due to drainage concerns. If I were Duke, I’d shut it down ASAP and leave the area. Who needs to deal with the headaches, the insanity, and the ignorance?

    Fools here don’t get that everything runs on vast amounts of electricity. And to keep prodding the only large provider of it with more lunacy, they have every reason to simply leave. And no one can blame them.

  2. jan kubiniec

    Regarding the substation. Matthews Ford is really the best place for the substation. It’s been sitting there waiting for it for a long time. That are currently suffers from lack of identity and to put more retail use there just muddies the waters of an already complicated road.

  3. Fin

    Outrageous!! Who lets these common sense letter writers post on this fine paper?! City has their vision, best if “the people” stay out of the way.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.