Annexation equals progress

On March 16, I had a letter published in favor of North Carolina’s annexation code and encouraging Asheville’s continuation in the battle to incorporate Biltmore Lake [“You May Need Annexation as Much as It Needs You,” Xpress]. My family has lived in North Carolina for several generations. In that time, it has evolved from the Rip Van Winkle state, (slept for 100 years post-Civil War), to the vibrant, diverse culture that we are.

Two great factors aiding this change were the development of our incredible university system and an annexation policy that allowed a rural state to help cities cope with inevitable growth. The law is both fair and simple: Once adjacent areas reach a density that is more urban in nature than rural, the existing municipality can absorb them. This keeps the central city from growth-stagnation and fiscal strangulation.

Recently there was an article in the Xpress comparing the size of Asheville city government with the North Carolina cities closest in population just larger (Greenville) and just smaller (Jacksonville) (see “Head to Head,” April 6). Really, these are the cities closest to us in size? What a joke. One needs only compare our infrastructure, cultural attractions, events, architecture, restaurants etc., to those towns and it is obvious that Asheville has been too slow to incorporate outlaying urbanized areas.

I am sure that many of the residents of Biltmore Lake came here from other places. If a view was the only goal they could have gone anywhere in overwhelmingly rural WNC to find low taxes, but convenience comes with proximity to Asheville, and proximity comes at a legal cost in this state — annexation.

— Steve Woolum


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Annexation equals progress

  1. Typo.

    The letter is missing the word “forced” (annexation) at the end. This is the progressive’s favorite method of achieving their ends. Why leave it out?

  2. No, that’s not a typo. The word “outlaying” subbing for “outlying” is probably a typo.

    The word you are looking for is omission, as it is a word that was left out of something. In your case, you feel as though it leaves out something that fundamentally alters the meaning and connotation of the word it is meant to modify.

    So, what you’re doing is being intellectually dishonest. Either that, or just ignorant.

  3. indy499

    I have mixed feelings on this topic. It is probably a bit more complicated than most people make it. One piece often overlooked is the current tax structure which is hugely unfair from the city perspective. Why does the city get to keep a smaller share of the sales tax revenue generated WITHIN the city than does the county?

    For all the folks who are opposed to forced annexation, are you also opposed to county residents getting a tax break at the city’s expense?

    Lastly, I think the city has been very passive in dealing with the broader growth/revenue issue of which annexation is only a part. If the state forecloses forced annexation, what other options does the city have? How about a commuter tax? Different parking rates for city residents and non-residents? Other ideas? For all who live around, but not in Asheville, who claim to never come in to town or use the city services, these charges shouldn’t be an issue, since they claim to never be here.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.