Obama’s surprising boost for FISA

With the passage of a reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in the Senate, it seems as if Obama is finally OK with warrantless wiretaps. With the civil liberties of Americans allegedly being shredded with every tapped phone call, his vote is quite unnerving. But this vote could sway independents and centrist Democrats. …

In a frightening scenario, it’s plainly true that if certain terrorist plots aren’t stopped, many more Americans would die. The Constitution states the president will protect Americans from enemies foreign and domestic (Article 4, Section 4).

What’s better is that the reauthorization of FISA granted retroactive immunity to telecoms that cooperated with the government after the 9/11 attacks. One must remember that the trial lawyers would benefit from telecom companies not being exempted.

Evidently the ACLU purports that the FISA Amendments Act is unconstitutional. On July 14, Townhall.com columnist Debra J. Saunders (“Wiretapping and Toe Tapping”) quoted an ACLU statement as saying: “It places virtually no restrictions on the government’s targeting of people outside the U.S., even if those targets are communicating with U.S. citizens and residents.”

And one wonders why there has been no terrorist attack on the U.S. homeland since 9/11.

With the billions and billions of calls made in the United States every day, it would be physically impossible to monitor all communications. Because of the sheer number of calls made, only those from suspected terrorists would be monitored. And because of that immense number, only a very few of those are actually recorded. … It seems anyone not talking to a terrorist with plans to kill as many Americans as possible would never have to worry about their conversations being tapped.

The administration has already been working with Verizon, AT&T and BellSouth. In a letter to supporters, Obama stated, “Given the choice between voting for an improved yet imperfect bill, and losing important surveillance tools, I’ve chosen to support the current compromise.” Has Obama finally seen the light, or is he using a typical campaign ploy to lure voters?

— Kevin Roeten
Asheville

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Obama’s surprising boost for FISA

  1. Jefferson Ideal

    “The administration has already been working with Verizon, AT&T;and BellSouth. In a letter to supporters, Obama stated, “Given the choice between voting for an improved yet imperfect bill, and losing important surveillance tools, I’ve chosen to support the current compromise.” Has Obama finally seen the light, or is he using a typical campaign ploy to lure voters?”

    Good question. Obama obviously is quite willing to veer right, sometimes way right, in order to gather blue dog democrats and independents to get elected. After all, he has already completely reversed himself on Iraq and now supports McCain’s position that it would take up to 16 months to withdraw from Iraq. Obama also added that the decision would depend on what is happening currently on the ground, echoes of President Bush’s position.

    But then again, Obama is the candidate of the far leftwing New York Times, and the ACLU. So where does he really stand? Is he just an empty suit who simply is trying to get elected? We’ll see as we get closer to November. But one can always play it safe and vote John McCain. That’s my course of action.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.