Vote against the bonds and hold our leaders accountable

Joe Minicozzi Courtesy of Urban3


This election, Buncombe County is asking us to take out a pair of bonds to pay for affordable housing and open spaces. These are two issues that I deeply support and are laudable goals for every community, especially our community. They match my and our community values, but I’m asking you to vote no.

The simple reason we shouldn’t give county officials an additional $70 million is that they could already have those funds. Instead, they have chosen to subsidize our wealthiest households with property tax discounts.

Our wealthiest households are not paying their fair share now, and these bonds will simply add to the inequity, asking disproportionately assessed lower-income households to continue to shoulder more than their fair share of the burden. Simply put, poor folks are being assessed higher than rich folks, which means they pay a greater share of taxes. The bonds will be paid by property taxes, which means that the poor folks will be shouldering more than rich folks.

Subsidizing the wealthy

My company, Urban3, has done the math. Our analysis shows the county receives at least $1 million per year in taxes from poorer households whose properties are overassessed and loses $5.9 million per year from uncollected taxes due to underassessed luxury properties. This equals a $6.9 million subsidy to the wealthiest people in Buncombe County because of how our assessment process works.

We presented this math in 2021 and asked the county to stop the reassessment and make it more equitable. They chose to continue with the assessment, which means that this abuse will happen every year until the system is corrected. The county seems unwilling to reassess, which means that our next option to be fairer and more equitable will be 2025.

That means the four years of giving nearly $7 million in subsidies to the rich will swell to $27.6 million by then. The $300,000 homeowner grant program that the county offers comes nowhere near solving this problem.

Additionally, the county has admitted that it is not enforcing several state laws that, their own evidence shows, provided an additional subsidy to the wealthy of over $4.4 million in uncollected “property discovery” taxes. This was discovered from just 2% of the housing stock in 2021. These are no small errors. It is conservative to assume that there may be 25 times that amount in the remaining 98% of the housing stock, equal to another $110 million in tax subsidy. These subsidies mean the county is forgoing funds the community is owed that could be funding our urgent needs — such as affordable housing or open spaces.

Let’s recap:
$27.6 million in annualized subsidy to wealthy households
+ $110 million in missing “discovered” property taxes
– $1.2 million in rebates to low-wealth households
= $136.4 million in subsidies for the homeowners who need it the least.

Buncombe County is asking voters for another $70 million to do the right thing — yet they are investing $136 million in the wrong thing? Rather than throw more money at a problem, we should stop the rich folks’ subsidy. If we did, we’d have $70 million for open space and affordable housing, as well as $66 million left over for unfunded school programs, homelessness, opioid addiction treatment, better transit and more staff to properly assess properties, among other critical needs.

Talk is cheap

There is a lot of talk about equity and systemic racism, but talk is cheap. People of color in our community are more likely to be poorer, and our system works to perpetuate this. White property owners are eight times more likely to receive a property tax subsidy, a textbook example of systemic bias.

We have presented our findings to the majority of our county commissioners as well as county staff. The result has been token gestures, empathetic statements and empty promises. The commissioners created an ad hoc committee to study inequity but then chose to do … nothing. The commissioners even asked representatives from this ad hoc committee how they addressed equity issues, and the response was an awkward nothing burger.

We need affordable housing. We need to add to our open space infrastructure. We need to start following state laws and our state constitution with regard to the way property is taxed, and we need to do it fairly and across the board. We need to live up to the promise of equity in our community. We need to stop shorting our community to benefit our wealthiest members. We need to stop this “wealth fare” now.

Advocates of affordable housing and open spaces have asked me not to speak out against these bond referendums. The truth is that we wouldn’t need the bonds if we simply collected the taxes we are owed by law and by fairness. Asking the entire community to pay more and continue to let a small percentage pay less makes no sense. Putting another burden on those least able to afford it so that those most able to afford it can continue to receive a subsidy is simply wrong.

I do value open space, as well as affordable housing. I also value fair taxation and good government overall. If our government isn’t willing to ensure fairness and be accountable, then I can’t support throwing $70 million more at a problem when this same government cannot fix a $136 million failure of equity.

Let’s move the leadership beyond lip service and keep their hands out of our pockets until they stop subsidizing the rich. Please vote against the bonds and hold our leaders accountable.

Joe Minicozzi is the founder and principal of Urban3 and the former executive director of the Asheville Downtown Association.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

10 thoughts on “Vote against the bonds and hold our leaders accountable

  1. MV

    I would like to add that the affordable housing bond will likely benefit wealthy white developers far more than it will aspiring home owners/essential workers, since most of the housing will come in the form of apartments owned by out-of-state corporations. The other group that the bond will benefit: BCTDA, whose activities and perpetual unnecessary marketing are the root cause of most of the challenges we face–but especially housing since tourists buy 2nd and 3rd homes and absorb other rentals as Airbnbs. Save Our Community: VOTE NO ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Make elected officials and the TDA put their money where their mouths are.

  2. North Asheville

    Thank you, Mr. Minicozzi, for this thoughtful, articulate opinion.

  3. kw

    Also, everyone who votes for AFFORDABLE HOUSING will be complicit in the future destruction of our communities and neighborhoods. Developers will pressure elected officials who will say, “We must green light this project even if it sucks, and even it brings horrendous traffic and destroys yet another ‘existing affordable’ neighborhood of essential workers. After all, the public voted yes and so we must not stand in the way.”


    • Prop Joe

      Not Grove Park (did you ever get the scoop on those firefighters?) or the other richy neighborhoods. They’ll be left pristine I hope.

      • kw

        Nah, man, dem firefightin’ felons done skedaddled back to Florida, but thanks for the reminder for me to get back to my holy quest for the truth…

  4. Phillip Gibson

    Great points Joe! Other regional communities should apply these recommendations.

  5. SpareChange

    One of the more interesting opinion pieces I’ve read this election cycle. I voted early, and my gut instinct was to support the bond issues. On further consideration though, and absent the kinds of specific arguments offered by Mr. Minicozzi, I began to question support for the housing bond in particular. Local governments have a poor track record when it comes to housing issues, and Asheville has plenty of historical evidence to support that conclusion in the form of the many scattered, highly segregated, and socially isolated housing projects it developed in past decades. Apart from that, area governments also just lack the resources to ultimately have much impact on the local housing market, which is a multi-billion dollar enterprise.

    I ended up voting no, and the insights offered above regarding the inequities on the revenue collection end of things add another leg of support for having done so.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.