To Kill a Mockingbird-attachment0

To Kill a Mockingbird

Movie Information

In Brief: Harper Lee's novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, has become a classic of modern American literature, and Robert Mulligan's film has become something of a classic itself — though perhaps one more of association than on its own merits, notable as they are in capturing the book. Gregory Peck has rarely been as good as he is here and the rest of the cast is of equally high caliber. It is, in fact, hard to fault on any level (and in my opinion, that may not entirely be a good thing).
Score:

Genre: Drama
Director: Robert Mulligan (Summer of '42)
Starring: Gregory Peck, Mary Badham, John Megna, Frank Overton, Ruth White, Brock Peters
Rated: NR

Robert Mulligan’s To Kill a Mockingbird (1962) is one of those movies that have become unassailable standards (TCM seems to run it every couple weeks) — and, no, I’m not about to assault it myself. Like the Harper Lee novel it’s adapted from, it’s every inch a finely-crafted,  well-intended, thoughtful work — and apart from the fact both feel like something a grade school teacher would recommend to the brighter students (which is the fault of neither the book, nor the movie), I have nothing at all against them. I’ve simply never been able to get all that excited about them, especially Mulligan’s movie. Having just watched it for the first time in years for this review, I realized two things: It’s more exciting than I tend to allow, but, yes, it still feels kind of like an extra credit assignment to me. However, the only thing I can locate as a direct annoyance is when Elmer Bernstein’s score gets all Hollywood folksy — meaning it sounds like imitation Aaron Copland. The film itself is perfectly realized — and is like little else in Robert Mulligan’s filmography. The period, the locale and the mood are beautifully evoked. Plus, if you place the film in the context of its year — 1962 — it’s more daring than it feels 50 years later.

The great strength of the film is that it captures the book’s childhood point of view. These are all very adult events, but they’re adult events as seen from childhood. The film wisely make no issue of this. I’m not sure there’s even a single shot in it that attempts an actual children’s point of view, but it very carefully presents nothing that isn’t witnessed by either Scout (Mary Badham) or her brother Jem (Philip Alford). One or both of them are present in every scene (they’re really much more the stars than the adults), keeping what is experienced wholly on their level — or at least the level as remembered by the adult Scout (played in narration by an unbilled Kim Stanley). For this alone, the film is remarkable. What’s interesting about this from the point of Robert Mulligan is that he adopted much of the same approach nine years later — with older children — in Summer of ‘42, so someone clearly understood why Mockingbird worked as well as it does.

The Hendersonville Film Society will show To Kill a Mockingbird Sunday, April 14 at 2 p.m. in the Smoky Mountain Theater at Lake Pointe Landing Retirement Community (behind Epic Cinemas), 333 Thompson St., Hendersonville.

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress since December 2000. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Leave a Reply