Governor McCrory responds to criticism of House Bill 2 with Q&A sheet on new law

In response to local and national criticism of the recently-passed North Carolina House Bill 2, which Governor Pat McCrory signed into law earlier this week, the governor’s office has released a Question & Answer sheet on the new law, what it prohibits and what it means for businesses and residents in North Carolina.

H.B. 2 — which prohibits municipalities from imposing their own anti-discrimination policies on private businesses in regards to gender and sexual orientation, as well as requiring public facilities to designate restrooms and locker rooms based on biological gender identity — has met with widespread opposition and consternation from LGBT advocacy groups, national media outlets like the New York Times and the Huffington Post, businesses and organizations ranging from IBM and Lowe’s Home Improvement to Google and the National Basketball Association, and North Carolina residents concerned that the new law opens the door to discrimination against homosexuals and the transgender community and erodes discrimination protections for employees.

Proponents of H.B. 2 argue that private businesses and organizations are still free to set their own anti-discrimination policies. State lawmakers in favor of the bill stated that it was necessary to protect the safety and privacy of women and children utilizing locker rooms and public restrooms.

Statewide protests have been held throughout the week since McCrory signed the bill into law on Wednesday, including a rally in Downtown Asheville on Thursday afternoon. The twitter hashtag #WeAreNotThis has gained steam across the internet community among those opposed to the new law.

See the press release below for the official response from Governor McCrory’s office:

Press release:

Myths vs Facts:What New York Times, Huffington Post and other media outlets aren’t saying about common-sense privacy law

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 26, 2016
Contact: govpress@nc.gov
919-814-2100

1. Does the new bill limit or prohibit private sector companies from adopting their own nondiscrimination policies or practices?

Answer: No. Businesses are not limited by this bill. Private individuals, companies and universities can adopt new or keep existing nondiscrimination policies.

2. Does this bill take away existing protections for individuals in North Carolina?

Answer: No. In fact, for the first time in state history, this law establishes a statewide anti-discrimination policy in North Carolina which is tougher than the federal government’s. This also means that the law in North Carolina is not different when you go city to city. 

3. Can businesses and private facilities still offer reasonable accommodations for transgender people, like single occupancy bathrooms for instance?

Answer: Yes. This bill allows and does nothing to prevent businesses, and public or private facilities from providing single use bathrooms. 

4. Can private businesses, if they choose, continue to allow transgender individuals to use the bathroom, locker room or other facilities of the gender they identify with, or provide other accommodations? 

Answer: Yes. That is the prerogative of private businesses under this new law. For instance, if a privately-owned sporting facility wants to allow attendees of sporting events to use the restroom of their choice, or install unisex bathrooms, they can. The law neither requires nor prohibits them from doing so.

5. Does this law prohibit towns, cities or counties in North Carolina from setting their own nondiscrimination policies in employment that go beyond state law?

Answer: No. Town, cities and counties in North Carolina are still allowed to set stricter non-discrimination policies for their own employees if they choose.

6. Does this bill mean transgender people will always have to use the restroom of the sex of their birth, even if they have undergone a sex change? 

Answer: No. This law simply says people must use the bathroom of the sex listed on their birth certificate. Anyone who has undergone a sex change can change their sex on their birth certificate.

7. I’m worried about how this new law affects transgender children or students in North Carolina. Does this bill allow bullying against transgender children in schools?

Answer: Absolutely not. North Carolina law specifically prohibits bullying and harassing behavior against children on the basis of sexual identity. 

8. Does this bill affect people with disabilities?

Answer: No. Statewide law also bans discrimination based on disability.

9. Why did North Carolina pass this law in the first place?

Answer: The bill was passed after the Charlotte City Council voted to impose a regulation requiring businesses to allow a man into a women’s restroom, shower, or locker room if they choose. This ordinance would have eliminated the basic expectations of privacy people have when using the rest room by allowing people to use the restroom of their choice. This new local regulation brought up serious privacy concerns by parents, businesses and others across the state, as well as safety concerns that this new local rule could be used by people who would take advantage of this to do harm to others.

In fact, the Charlotte City Council tried to pass this ordinance before but failed, and passed the same ordinance in February of 2016 despite serious concerns from state officials, business leaders and other concerned citizens.

 

10. What about parents or caregivers bringing children into the restroom?

Answer: The law provides exceptions to young children accompanied by parents or care givers.

11. Will this bill threaten federal funding for public schools under Title IX?

Answer: No, according to a federal court which has looked at a similar issue.

12. Will this bill prevent people from receiving medical attention in an emergency.

Answer: Absolutely not. Nothing will prevent people from receiving medical attention in public or private accommodations. 

13. Will this bill affect North Carolina’s ability to create or recruit jobs?

Answer: This bill does not affect companies in North Carolina. North Carolina was one of the top states to do business in the country before this law was passed, and preventing Charlotte’s bathroom ordinance from going into effect on April 1 won’t change that.

14. Why is the state telling cities and towns what it can and can’t do by repealing an ordinance the elected members of the Charlotte City Council passed?

Answer: North Carolina is one of at least 37 states like Virginia where cities and towns cannot pass rules or regulations that exceed the authority given to them by the state. In passing the bathroom ordinance, Charlotte was exceeding its authority and setting rules that had ramifications beyond the City of Charlotte. The legislature acted to address privacy and safety concerns if this ordinance was allowed to go into effect on April 1. 

15. Do any other regulations in North Carolina cities, towns or counties come close to what Charlotte was recommending?

Answer: No. Not that we are aware of. Therefore, nothing changes in North Carolina cities, towns and counties, including in Charlotte, regarding discrimination practices and protections now that this law has passed.

16. Did only Republicans vote for this bill?

Answer: No. 11 Democrats voted for this bill in the N.C. House of Representatives and no Democratic Senators voted against it. In fact, Democratic Senators walked out to avoid voting on the issue at all because many were going to vote for it and they did not want show their division. 

17. Why did the Legislature call a special session to overturn the bathroom ordinance?

Answer: The new Charlotte ordinance, which would have required all businesses to change their restroom policies and take away the expectation of privacy people have when using the restroom, was going to go into effect on April 1 if no action was taken.

18. Is North Carolina at a disadvantage when it comes to recruiting jobs because it does not have ordinances like the one Charlotte was proposing? 

Answer: No. In fact in the last 3 years without an ordinance like this, North Carolina has created the 6th most jobs in the country – over 260,000 net new jobs. We know of no examples of companies being recruited to North Carolina that have asked if the state has an ordinance like the one Charlotte was proposing.

 

SHARE
About Max Hunt
Max Hunt grew up in South (New) Jersey and graduated from Warren Wilson College in 2011. History nerd; art geek; connoisseur of swimming holes, hot peppers, and plaid clothing. Follow me @J_MaxHunt

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

9 thoughts on “Governor McCrory responds to criticism of House Bill 2 with Q&A sheet on new law

  1. Here’s an expanded version written by bill sponsors Reps. Chris Millis and Dan Bishop:

    “Last week the General Assembly met in a Special Session to handle a matter of urgent importance facing our state. Much of the debate that led up to, during, and after the session has consisted of false accusations and deception. Therefore, I feel it is necessary that I write you at length to inform you of the truth. I strongly encourage you to read this entire post, regardless of your initial approval/disapproval of the legislative action…”
    bit.ly/1UmFrff

    • Tom Williams

      Another paid opinion by Tim. This time Tim wants to justify this legislation of discrimination. Tim will never run out of work, attempting to make the people who pay him to look good.

    • Also, enjoy this episode of NC Spin on House Bill 2:
      bit.ly/1UwMdPO
      …………………………………………………………………

    • House Bill 2 / S.L. 2016-3 explained by UNC School of Government.

      Significantly, G.S. 115C-521.2 does not entirely preclude accommodations for transgender students. The statute allows local school boards to offer accommodations such as single occupancy bathrooms or changing rooms or controlled access to faculty facilities “upon a request due to special circumstances.” So, for instance, a transgender student who is uncomfortable using a bathroom or changing room with students of the same biological sex could be given access to a single occupancy bathroom or changing room. According to the new statute, however, acceptable accommodations do not include allowing a student to use a multiple occupancy bathroom or changing room reserved for students of the opposite sex…
      unc.live/1Y0cpQG

    • Contract provisions of House Bill 2 / S.L. 2016-3 explained by UNC School of Government.

      Perhaps not as newsworthy but nonetheless important to local governments, the legislation also places new limits on the contracting authority of cities and counties…Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the bill amend the contracting statutes for cities and counties (G.S. 160A-20.1(a) for cities and G.S. 153A-449(a) for counties) in three ways…
      unc.live/1UsauGn

  2. Yep

    Great explanation from McCrory and Co! Hope it will show all the over reactors how foolish they are and Rob Reiner too!
    Never seen such a ridiculous over reaction by those who did not even read the bill , but they just wanted the DRAMA and BS.

  3. Rep. Dan Bishop appears on MSNBC to discuss House Bill 2:
    bit.ly/1ZC48nj
    …………………………………………………………………

  4. Yep

    oh, and guess what…Rob Reiner has NEVER filmed a movie in NC ! lolol>>> whatta douchebag!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.