Buncombe County is out for blood, according to Matthew Putnam. Changes to health insurance benefits proposed by high-level county staff, said the Buncombe employee during public comment at the Jan. 21 Board of Commissioners meeting, will require all workers and their spouses to submit to intravenous blood draws and other medical testing or pay double their current premiums.
Hanna Honeycutt, who works along with Putnam as a lawyer for the county’s Department of Health and Human Services, noted that the new requirements would penalize employees who did not share their protected health information with a third-party company, Denver, N.C.-based Synergy Healthcare. The firm would use the measurements to create a “risk score” for each insured individual; those deemed high risk would be required to visit the employee clinic and develop a health improvement plan.
County Manager Avril Pinder and Senior Staff Attorney Michael Frue, the two lawyers argued, were pushing the changes through without proper oversight from elected officials. Buncombe’s personnel ordinance, Putnam said, requires commissioners to approve any “change in employee benefits structure and options,” but the county’s attorneys had claimed that the modifications were below the level requiring the board’s consideration.
“What’s more disturbing than the blood draw is the fact that county legal and this current county administration is taking an approach that would even attempt to skirt past Board of Commissioners oversight,” Putnam said. “Our recent scandals have shown that transparency and oversight should be the touchstones of not only every county employee, but certainly the Board of Commissioners.”
Speaking with Xpress after the meeting, Pinder stood by her legal team’s evaluation of the changes and the need for board evaluation. She said the health assessments and risk scores — along with a 6.6% increase in all employee contributions toward premiums — were required to control Buncombe’s rising worker health care expenses.
“We responded to that,” Pinder said about the concerns of Putnam and Honeycutt. “They didn’t like the response, so I think that’s why they’re here tonight.”
Pinder and Frue also told Xpress that they weren’t aware of any other employees who had raised concerns over the new policy. However, a thread about the health risk assessments on the county’s internal forums contained critical comments from at least a dozen other Buncombe workers as of Jan. 16. “I feel we are still paying for the sins of others!” wrote Valerie Wright in a comment that received 20 likes.
According to the county’s website, employees must submit their medical testing information to Synergy by Sunday, March 15. Pinder said commissioners will vote on the new premium schedule, including penalties for noncompliance with the testing, as part of the fiscal year 2020-21 budget.
In other news
Also during public comment, a contingent of five Black Mountain and Montreat residents asked the commissioners to formally censure county municipalities that moved their elections from 2019 to 2020. This change, they argued, gave many local officials an unelected extra year in office and violated the basic tenets of democracy.
“More than 75,000 Buncombe County residents, 40% of county voters, were denied access to the ballot box,” said Montreat resident Mary Standaert. “Such actions undermine confidence in the entire voting process.”
And following a three-hour special meeting earlier in the day, commissioners unanimously appointed eight members of the inaugural nine-member Parks, Greenways and Recreation Advisory Board. Representing District 1 are Dusty Allison, Sam Mason and Derek Turno, while representing District 3 are Ally Howell, Lena Richards and Teresa Williams.
Because not all applicants from District 2 could attend the interviews, commissioners named only Ann Babcock and Carol Peterson to the board. The final member will be appointed from the remaining District 2 candidates at a later date.
How is this insurance?! What’s to stop this company from DNA-testing for certain genetic markers—and then keeping that info to themselves and their risk-control department? Privacy seems to be a thing of the past. Thumbs down.
Many states have chosen to pass legislation to prevent this type of discrimination. North Carolina, unfortunately, is not one of them.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/genetic-nondiscrimination-in-health-insurance-laws.aspx
Whoaa! Hold your horses. No one is talking or even contemplating genetic testing. I agree and most everyone would agree that would be outrageous.
What the County is proposing is what most corporations have moved to years back and it makes total sense. People need to know if they have underlying conditions such as high cholesterol and be responsible to take reasonable actions to control it. Same with diabetes and a host of other chronic type conditions (e.g., greatly overweight) that can lead to expensive outcomes for the health program. This is all about personal responsibility for one’s health.
I’m a County taxpayer and I believe this type of program is long overdue. I don’t know if the City of Asheville does this, but judging by the waste line of many of their employees, I doubt it. I will be inquiring.
If employees have issues with this approach, they can a) find insurance elsewhere and/or b) find employment elsewhere. There is no god given right to health insurance, in spite of what most people think.
Sorry if this comes across as a bit harsh; no disrespect intended. But our health system in this country is broken and while there are many other things that need fixing, personal responsibility for one’s health is a main one.
County employee here. I got a blood draw at my local health dept (not Buncombe County) for a standard blood panel: cholesterol, glucose, triglycerides, and PSA (for men). All the company is getting is the numbers, not the blood itself. But, yes, this still feels invasive. The alternative? Higher premiums.
I am a little shocked that the Xpress chose to publish screenshots from an employee intranet regarding this matter.
Hello J.M., thanks much for reading. We received the employee intranet information from Buncombe’s legal department as part of a public records request for correspondence between the county and its employees about the health risk assessments.
This is what you get when you elect so-called “progressives.” But it seems the sheeple will never learn.
Vampires! literally VAMPIRES! Blood sucking for profit insurance has our government by the NADS
Health care costs money! Until it’s free and all providers give there resources away for free there has to be a way to pay for it all. That’s what drives this type of thing. Look at it this way the cost of the insurance went up but the employees can save their dollars if they choose to have their blood samples drawn. Reality bites!