Council asks voters to approve $80 million bond package

MAKING A POINT: Council members Kim Roney, left, and Maggie Ullman discuss the bond package at the July 23 Asheville City Council meeting. Photo by Pat Moran

Asheville City Council voted unanimously, 6-0, July 23 to put four, $20 million general obligation bonds on the Nov. 5 ballot. Council member Sheneika Smith was absent.

The bonds, if all approved by voters, would provide $20 million for housing, $20 million for transportation, $20 million for parks and recreation and $20 million for public safety.

Tony McDowell, the City of Asheville’s director of finance, said the entire package would mean an estimated property tax increase of $110 for the owner of a property assessed at $420,946, the city’s average house value.

That tax would be atop a citywide tax increase of $25.20 for owners of property valued at $400,000 and a Buncombe County increase of $78. Those with property in the newly approved Business Improvement District downtown will face an additional increase of $360 per year.

Three people spoke in favor of the bonds before the vote. David Nutter, chairman of Connect Buncombe’s advocacy and partnership committee, supported the bonds.

“We believe these investments are welcoming for all the people in our community,” Nutter said.

Sally Grau and Brooke Heaton, members of Rebuild Malvern Hills Pool, thanked Council for its commitment to rebuild the historic pool with general obligation funds.

“Our community fabric is woven by the spaces we share, public schools, parks, libraries and in the hot days of summer swimming pools,” Grau said, “These public spaces mean so much … because they bring us together. We see and greet our friends and neighbors, we make new friends, and with each hug, each high-five, each hello, we build the fabric that makes our city the kind of place that people love to live [in].”

“There’s no better way to see our tax dollars at work than in the excited giggles of a kid splashing on a hot summer day,” Heaton said.

In other news

The Asheville City Council approved, 5-1, rezoning a 27-acre project at 767 New Haw Creek Road for an 84-unit residential development. Council member Kim Roney voted in opposition.

The estate of landowner Margaret B. King and the project’s applicant, Warren Sugg of Civil Design Concepts, requested rezoning the parcel in East Asheville from Residential Single-Family Medium Density District (RS-4), which permits single-family homes, to Residential Expansion — Conditional Zone (RES EXP-CZ), which permits a range of high-density single and multifamily homes.

The plan, presented by Sam Starr-Baum, urban planner II with the City of Asheville’s Planning and Urban Design Department, will include 49 single-family homes and 35 townhomes, as well as parking, amenities and stormwater infrastructure.

The project, which also includes a 4.3-acre tree canopy preservation area on the eastern portion of the property, was approved 4-3 by the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 20.

The plan is the result of a compromise between developer L.B. Jackson and Co. and the Haw Creek Community Association. A previous proposal had included 92 housing units — 57 homes and 35 townhouses.

Twenty-four speakers addressed the Council during the hearing, nearly split between those for and against the project.

“It has been a bumpy road getting to this place,” Chris Pelly, president of the Haw Creek Community Association, said during public comments. “Within Haw Creek there has been a range of opinions about the best path forward.” Pelly praised Mayor Esther Manheimer’s role in fostering negotiations between Pelly and his neighbors and property developer Jackson.

“I believe that the proposal; before you is the least worst option,” Pelly continued. “For this reason, the 12-member board of directors of the Haw Creek Community Association have tepidly but unanimously supported the proposal before you today.”

Additionally, Council approved a contract  for the repair and replacement of HVAC parts and equipment in the Thomas Wolfe Auditorium, passed a resolution authorizing  up to $2 million for ongoing improvements at McCormick Field and designated the F.W. Woolworth building in downtown Asheville as the city’s latest historic landmark.

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Pat Moran
As Mountain Xpress' City Reporter, I'm fascinated with how Asheville and its people work. Previously, I spent 25 years in Charlotte, working for local papers Creative Loafing Charlotte and Queen City Nerve. In that time I won three North Carolina Press Association Awards and an Emmy. Prior to that, I wrote and produced independent feature films in Orlando, Florida. Follow me @patmoran77

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Council asks voters to approve $80 million bond package

  1. Think about it

    Always a money grab, because they cannot be bothered to establish and execute a budget and spending plan.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.