Beer City, USA — or DWI City, USA? (Long version)

Graphic by Lori Deaton

Editor’s note: Reader interest in this topic has prompted Xpress to post the following longer version of the letter to the editor “Beer City, USA — or DWI City, USA?” which appeared in the May 20 issue and online.

I have been an upstanding and law-abiding citizen all of my life. In July 2014, I was arrested and charged with the offense of driving under the influence of alcohol, while being within the legal limit of blood-alcohol content (BAC) and without any appreciable signs of impairment. In my entire 60-plus years, I have never had to endure such a challenge to my character as well as wade through a tedious and expensive legal process. After being convicted in District Court, I appealed that conviction and took the case to a jury in Superior Court. I was found not guilty by a jury.

The entire traffic stop and arrest was recorded on video by the police vehicle dash camera. Videos like this are not permitted in District Court, and I had to fight tooth and nail to make it available to my lawyer for use in Superior Court, as the video was the only tangible proof of my innocence, and otherwise it would have only been my word against the officer’s.

The Asheville DWI task force is trained to look for 24 signs/clues in order to deem an individual impaired, and only one was used against me. I simply failed to turn on my headlights after leaving a well-lit parking lot. The traffic stop that followed was unnerving, and I was treated as though my guilt was a foregone conclusion, rather than being evaluated objectively for DWI. I tried my best to comply with the officer’s requests, as I have never encountered a situation like this, where I was assumed guilty without any evidence to this effect.

The police officer, with all [her] training and experience, got this one wrong! I was not impaired, nor was I confused. This was purely a case of harassment and entrapment. I was detained for far too long without charge. I was humiliated and stunned to be handcuffed and thrown in a police car and detained further at the station while the officer tried in vain to have me blow over the legal limit, to justify the arrest.

I have certainly received an education in North Carolina DWI law.  My ordeal made it blatantly apparent to me how ambiguous and open to interpretation North Carolina DWI laws are.

First of all, it is not against the law to have a drink and drive as long as you are not impaired by that substance or by any other substance. Your [blood]-alcohol concentration (BAC) must be below 0.08 for adults, 0.00 under 21 years of age and .04 if driving a commercial vehicle. It would seem that the law should either limit your BAC to below .08 or it should be 0.0. This gray area somewhere in between is a big problem for all the communities in North Carolina, and especially for a robust and growing city like Asheville, so-called “Beer City, USA” and one the top 10 of places to live.

When I moved here in the ’80s, Asheville was a boarded-up ghost town. If we want to foster a thriving tourism economy, and, it would seem, a “destination craft brew mecca” kind of culture, then law enforcement needs to understand that driving around in a DWI task force Humvee and hassling people on foot in downtown roadways sends a very mixed message to visitors who come here to enjoy local food, drink and culture.

It is apparent that our law enforcement officers have not been properly trained to deal with this new direction our fine city is obviously taking. Police officers can be extremely effective at preventing and punishing DWI without behaving as if there is a “gold rush” on DWI dollars.

They apparently need sensitivity training to help them understand how to evaluate and interface with decent, law-abiding citizens in their effort to sniff out offenders. In my situation, it was very apparent that the driving force behind my arrest had nothing to do with my impairment (or lack thereof, according to a Superior Court jury) and everything to do with reaching quotas, and justifying hasty and inappropriate behavior in the field.

Refusing to acknowledge any middle ground between letting someone go on their way and throwing them in a squad car exhibits a major oversight on the part of law enforcement. The idea that officers should be able to handle a situation like this respectfully, tactfully and appropriately should not be a foreign or unattainable concept.

This officer could have easily seen that I was not impaired enough to justify an arrest, and if she still had reservations about cutting me loose, could have provided an option to call a cab or a friend for a ride home. Arrest is not the only way to solve an ambiguous situation, but it is the only way to notch toward a quota that is used to justify federal funding for a local DWI task force.

To be very clear, I do not condone drunk or impaired driving! I do not wish to drive drunk or have anyone killed or injured due to drunk driving. I have respect for law enforcement. But we must take note that North Carolina law gives officers liberal discretion in deciding whether they believe someone is driving while intoxicated.

You can be arrested and charged with a DWI in North Carolina, purely at the discretion of the arresting officer. This puts an enormous responsibility on them to use logic and objectivity in their evaluation, which this officer thoroughly proved incapable of using. Asking someone to blow into a Breathalyzer again and again, hoping that the unit will eventually show a falsely high number (after several results within the legal limit) is morally and technically wrong, and it shows desperation and bias on the part of law enforcement.

You may not be aware that North Carolina’s top state judge has said that “DWI arrests are increasing, and the processing of cases sometimes stretches out for a year or longer.” This inundates the court system, and doesn’t allow it to function as it was designed. In Wake County, the chief justice’s solution is to increase funding for the system, leading an effort to get $30 million to increase salaries and cover operating costs. The district attorney’s office has upped the number of dedicated DWI courts, and has added more dates for hearing appeals. This type of thinking exacerbates the problem. Meanwhile, real crime goes unprosecuted. Tremendous backlog exists, as the system is continuously flooded with questionable (at best) DWI charges.

You may have noticed the brand-new, military-style DWI task force Humvees patrolling the streets here in Asheville. They are quite formidable, resembling a swat team with a DWI lab.  Does this make us feel safe, or does it cast a negative light on a flourishing and vibrant downtown?

As a city, we go to extensive measures marketing Asheville as an open, hospitable and welcoming environment for tourism dollars, which benefits local business, and local government in the form of tax revenue. Does this kind of police presence have any effect other than undermining the city’s stated goals, and making locals want to stay home, abandoning our fine restaurants, music venues and bars for fear of being persecuted incorrectly by law enforcement?

I would encourage everyone to familiarize themselves with the laws governing DWI in this state. I have had many friends charged with DWI with a BAC of less than .08. The costs involved are staggering. The waste of time and money prosecuting these cases is unconscionable. The price tag incurred for even a guilty plea is at least $1,000 from the onset and goes up from there, especially when you factor in the myriad of miscellaneous charges (towing fees, community service, counseling, etc.) and the resulting insurance rate hike.

These fees are absolutely devastating to most of our citizens. Within two days of my arrest, my mailbox was inundated with brochures from DUI lawyers and substance-abuse counselors. This is a racket, folks, and a revenue-generating money machine. I will now think twice about having a drink with dinner at one of our fine establishments, or a beer at one of our countless breweries, as I feel that the policy being employed by the Asheville Police Department is a gross overreach and misinterpretation of a law designed to protect people from legitimate drunk driving, as well as an unethical and opportunistic method to collect more money in the courts from local citizens.

If we want Asheville to thrive, we need to have a balanced and fair approach to handling the inevitable concerns that accompany a title like “Beer City, USA.” This requires some nuance and strategy on the part of law enforcement, who have consistently shown their response to be as if it’s a free-for-all, or open season on anyone they can [get] their hands on. Word travels fast about this kind of behavior, and it affects all demographics, not just kids acting irresponsibly, but upstanding locals and visitors who come to town to spend their money and support Asheville as a thriving destination.

If this injustice continues, at the very least, they are shooting themselves in the foot economically, and one day they may just board up downtown businesses and Asheville will return to the way it was in the ’80s … barren and lifeless.

— Aileen Pearlman
Fletcher

SHARE
About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

5 thoughts on “Beer City, USA — or DWI City, USA? (Long version)

  1. Chad Hansen

    The DWI laws in North Carolina for controlled PRESCRIPTION medications are even WORSE than for alcohol, meaning that for controlled prescriptions (Ativan, Xanax, and many other commonly prescribed medications that in low doses do NOT cause impairment in the ability to operate motor vehicles safely), there is no set line or measurement where you are considered “impaired” versus “not impaired”, as there is for alcohol at over .08 impaired versus under .08 not legally impaired, so if an officer stops you and demands to know if you are taking any medications and you tell the truth, they can arrest you right on the spot, regardless if that medication was prescribed or not or whether you were actually physically impaired or not. It is then up to you, as the original writer has painfully pointed out, to prove to a district court judge, who has heard it all before and couldn’t careless about the truth in these cases and just wants to continue his or her high percentage of DWI convictions as bragging rights in his or her re-election campaign propaganda, that you were not impaired by your prescribed medication, at a cost of many thousand of dollars in attorney fees, etc. Unfortunately this happened to me recently and I have been told by the two top DWI attorneys in town that I will probably be convicted in district court because officers, even known liars and/or “exaggerators” are always believed by the district court judges regardless of the facts/the truth but, on appeal to superior court, where a trial by jury is allowed, a jury, that will have no political motives to convict, will most likely not convict when the facts are presented. Keep in mind that appeals to superior court cost in the neighborhood of $10,000 and can take up to two years. Still think DWI’s aren’t politically/cash motivated?

    I couldn’t careless about the reputation of this town as a beer destination or whatever it wants to bill itself as. What I do care about it overzealous officers trampling on the rights of citizens, local or not, for accolades and promotions, judges who are elected and therefore, constantly having to prove that they are “tough on crime” at the expense of truth/real justice, some well meaning attorneys who are also caught up in a corrupt system that is set up with the primary goal of extracting as much cash as possible from the poor schmucks who happened to have a taillight out or have a real accident that had nothing to do with being impaired in any way. And I care that the average citizen has no idea whatsoever that their legally prescribed medications, the same medications that are taken safely by millions of people every day in this county, can send them directly to jail without passing go on the whims of too young and too eager officers who’s only real concern is continuing to feed their syndicate of professional crooks and thieves a steady supply of fresh monied blood.

  2. KC

    how about using this to promote public transit? easier ways to take advantage of all of the breweries we tout without the risk of driving impaired? Encourage services like Uber etc? I moved her from a major city and it is astounding how immobile this region is without a car. No commuter rail, no robust bus routes. A tourist can come here and cannot have lunch and a tasting at sierra nevada and make it back to have dinner at Wicked weed without forgoing some of the brews. Just seems like we could circumvent these task forces and have personal enjoyment and economic growth without offending anyone. I don’t offer solutions, but i’m sure they are spending the money to figure out how continue this “boom” and transportation should be a huge part of that.

  3. Well this makes me step back and reconsider our plans of relocating to Asheville. I too have strong feelings about drunk or impaired driving. There is simply no room on streets anywhere for an intoxicated driver. That being said there is also simply no room for police shenanigans. I am sure that many of the falsely convicted victims ( and yes, they are victims) do not have the means to appeal their bogus cases up the ladder. But they sure are handy for meeting a quota and enriching the economy of attorneys and other providers of convicted drunk driver “services”.
    It appears to me this is a beginning step in a police state. I sincerely hope it changes for the better soon.

    • Jake-0

      Ms. Pearlman gave a great video interview following her Not-Guilty verdict in Buncombe County Superior Court, it can be seen here https://youtu.be/xOSVirOXk7I

      I think the main question that remains is whether or not it is ethical for the city to promote Asheville as a ‘craft beer mecca’ in order to attract beer tourism dollars, only to exhibit a very aggressive and often inappropriate model for pursuing and prosecuting those who display the exact behavior that’s being marketed to them by every brewery, the chamber of commerce and the tourism board.

      If someone is legally intoxicated and a safety risk on the roads, thats one thing, and it’s a no brainer to penalize them. However, if they’re not appreciably impaired, and blow below 0.08%, law enforcement should not only respect peoples lawful rights, but should also respect that this city thrives on tourism dollars and the ‘Beer City USA’ moniker. otherwise it’s just ‘shooting fish in a barrel’.

  4. Idiots

    0.08 is an arbitrary limit. Not everyone can drive equally well at 0.08. This is evidenced by the lower level for minors. My 70 year-old mom becomes “impaired” with one glass of wine. But a 700 pound sumo wrestler not only would need more alcohol to get to that limit, he would have a different metabolism because of his gender and age.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.