Letter: General Assembly should let cities take action on plastic

Graphic by Lori Deaton

North Carolinians dispose of an estimated $41.4 million worth of plastic annually, and in just one year, they throw away enough plastic bottles to line the length of the Blue Ridge Parkway 642 times, according to North Carolina Health News. So why did the N.C. GOP General Assembly block plastic bans?

On Sept. 22, 2023, state lawmakers included a provision in the state budget prohibiting municipalities from enacting bans or fees on plastic bags and other single-use plastics. This has hindered local initiatives aimed at reducing plastic waste, especially in Asheville, where in much of 2023, there was a lot of local support toward a plastic-bag ban. Plastic bags offer much more harm than good as plastic bags can take up to 1,000 years to decompose fully. A plastic-bag ban would mean a focus on reusable bags and paper bags, which create significantly less pollution.

The justification for this provision is primarily centered around maintaining regulatory uniformity across the state and alleviating potential burdens on businesses. However, this approach ignores the pressing need for local governments to take action based on their specific environmental and public health needs. Cities such as Durham and Asheville were exploring bans or fees on plastic bags to address local waste management challenges and reduce environmental impact.

Furthermore, the argument that plastic bag fees disproportionately affect low-income communities overlooks the broader environmental justice issues. Low-income communities often bear the brunt of pollution and waste management problems. For instance, the GFL Sampson County Landfill, located near such communities, is one of the largest emitters of greenhouse gases among municipal landfills in the U.S.

It’s imperative that we recognize the long-term costs of maintaining the status quo. Plastic bags not only harm the environment but also incur significant costs for waste management systems. Mecklenburg County officials have pointed out that plastic bags cause operational issues and increase the costs of recycling efforts.

We need to move toward sustainable solutions that prioritize both environmental health and social equity. This includes rethinking our reliance on single-use plastics and empowering local governments to implement effective waste reduction policies. Consumer education and voluntary measures, while helpful, are not sufficient to address the scale of the plastic waste problem.

I urge North Carolina legislators to reconsider their stance and allow municipalities the flexibility to implement measures that protect our environment and communities. The health of our planet and future generations depends on our actions today.

— Sal Ward
Swannanoa

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.