Letter: Professionals, look in the mirror on city tax burden

Graphic by Lori Deaton

The mayor has recently raised the issue of a [food and beverage] tax. I am not opposed to taxes per se. What I have often have wondered, as a former restaurant owner, continuing volunteer and active citizen, why the city has not considered a tax on activities such as professional services? Perhaps there could be a tax on legal transactions, attorney fees, accounting fees and such?

I should like to point out: Asheville has received tremendous benefit from independent restaurants and tourism in general. I do grant there are downsides, as there are downsides to every endeavor. The Creative Asheville Community, of which I count the heroes of food labor, has provided the oxygen for a vibrant and energetic city. All the white-collar professions have benefited — we brought your clients here. Indeed, much of the present medical community moved here due to the food, music and other cultural amenities. Why not tax that activity as well?

The question, to me at least, is how to fairly distribute the responsibility of city finances. It is easy to point the finger, to stir the emotional pot, say “bad dog hospitality business”; it is really hard to say, “I, as a beneficiary of this remarkable renaissance, will also do my share; my practice, my business, should pitch in; tax me, too.”

I would also like to point out how generous our independent restaurant community partners are. In a recent study, conducted by Magellan Strategy Group for the Asheville Independent Restaurant Association, of 41 respondents, the average annual in-kind and cash contribution to local nonprofits averaged $19,933. I do not believe my restaurant peers frequently say “no” to their neighbors.

I believe it is a worthy consideration to ask our professional neighbors to take a look in the mirror. I don’t believe that a 1 percent F&B tax will damage the independent restaurants, but neither would a similar tax on professional services.

— Mark Rosenstein
Hero of kitchen labor (recovering)


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Letter: Professionals, look in the mirror on city tax burden

  1. luther blissett

    “why the city has not considered a tax on activities such as professional services?”

    Because the city has no powers of taxation other than those enumerated in state law.

  2. Lulz

    LOL you mean a tax on dimwits with an inflated ego and an exaggerated sense of self importance. Those types need to be mocked for the fools they are. Problem with this culture is that job titles are more important than character and intelligence and people are judged on the jobs they hold. And even though one particular power hungry individual had the title of county manager, she still was a low life piece of garbage thief. And the super smart people elected were either too stupid or just as big of scumbags as she was to do anything about it.

  3. Mike

    Huh- quite thoughtful, thanks for writing.

    My first thought is that food and beverage taxes are perceived as being primarily born by the tourism industry (not local business owners, which is an excellent point) and professional services depend on local resources rather than outside dollars. So, it’s easier to “sell” food and beverage tax because people think the cost is shifted to somebody other than themselves.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.