Letter: Woodfin board should address development concerns

Graphic by Lori Deaton

The community has serious concerns about the proposed development on Richmond Hill. I feel the Woodfin Board of Commissioners should publicly address these concerns in a formal statement through the local media well before the zoning variance hearing:

1. Who will be responsible to pay for the bridge?
2. Who will be responsible to pay for expanding River Road to cover the increased traffic flow?
3. Has the town of Woodfin made any concession to the developer, such as tax cuts?
4. Who will be required to cover costs if things don’t go as planned?
5a. Richmond Hill is a residential neighborhood in the city of Asheville lacking connections that could handle increased traffic flow. How will Woodfin commissioners prevent traffic to this development from being directed through Richmond Hill?
5b. If commissioners fail to prevent traffic through Richmond Hill, what plan do they have to compensate the city of Asheville to manage the infrastructure load?

Please respond publicly before the zoning variance hearing.

— Karl Kuhn
Asheville

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Letter: Woodfin board should address development concerns

  1. NIMBY

    Same old mentality.
    We want affordable housing! But not in my backyard.
    We want better paying jobs! But not in my backyard.
    We want progress! But not in my backyard.

    The writer asks some reasonable questions. Answers are needed. But we also need the development and growth. The poorest among us require it. The progressives among us should advocate for it.

    • Mike

      The Bluffs on RiverBend proposes 1500 luxury townhomes. It worsens our affordable housing problems. Basically, it’s a second Biltmore Park.

      Go drive Richmond Hill Drive or Riverside from Broadway to Silverline. Then, tell me how it’s reasonable that those two roads can support thousands of more vehicles per day.

      The developer of this project says “3,000 vehicles per day”; that’s hogwash. 1500 luxury town homes plus a retail center plus a 250 room hotel plus an amphitheater equals at least 10,000 vehicles per day- 2 per household, at least 2 trips per vehicle, plus hotel guests, employees, deliveries- you get the picture.

      Thanks!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.