Secrecy surrounding Pratt & Whitney deal raises critical issues

Cynthia Heil


As many know, Pratt & Whitney, a Raytheon Technologies subsidiary, has been courted by Biltmore Farms as well as state and local governments to build a plant in Buncombe County on Biltmore Farms property that was “sold” for $1. In addition, the developer is building a bridge across the French Broad River, from N.C. 191 to the plant site. The western end of the bridge is adjacent to The N.C. Arboretum and Blue Ridge Parkway entrances. The company is also seeking to have a new interchange built on Interstate 26 to improve access to the plant site.

My reason for writing is not to ask Mountain Xpress to investigate whatever environmental impacts this may create at the site or to inform the paper that the future occupant is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of weapons and weapons delivery systems. I am sure Xpress writers and editors  are quite aware of how much the U.S. Department of Defense and the wars it wages contribute to climate change. Neither am I writing to ask the paper to investigate the moral and ethical aspects of bringing a weapons manufacturer to the Asheville area, nor to inform Xpress about the people this particular weapons manufacturer is laying off in other states in order to close plants and move to North Carolina, a so-called “right-to-work” state.

Rather, my reason for writing is to request that Mountain Xpress investigate the cumbersome, secretive processes involved in this deal. A story in the Hendersonville Lightning some months ago revealed that this deal had been in the works for over a year before the public was even made aware of it. Reject Raytheon Asheville members have been advised by several Buncombe County commissioners that board members had to sign nondisclosure agreements and were not, themselves, made aware of what the deal was until the 11th hour. In addition, a state legislator told us off the record that state law supports keeping local officials out of the loop about such deals. Taken together, these facts raise a number of significant questions:

1) Does this mean the county commissioners were dealing in the dark, even down to the $27 million tax incentive package they gave Pratt & Whitney, a $20 billion company? Did the commissioners explore the potential for other forms of county funding that might have benefited far more county residents?

2) The commissioners have already tossed in $5 million for a building at the plant site where A-B Tech will offer job training. Now it seems the state may kick in another $5 million for the project. Whatever happened to the days when employers took responsibility for training their employees themselves?

3) What happened to real capitalism — when someone scrimped and saved in order to build their own business, rather than seeking a government/taxpayer payout?

4) Reject Raytheon Asheville is grateful to those local elected officials at both the county and state levels who have met with us and given us some insight into the processes behind this deal, but many questions remain — including some that even they can’t answer. We have an immense amount of talent in our group, ranging from young adults in the Sunrise Movement to the elders from Veterans for Peace. Those younger members are completely on top of environmental/social/economic/political issues; there are also retired career bureaucrats, engineers and executives, as well as teachers and college professors who conducted research for a living, but even they have found it nearly impossible to disentangle the labyrinth of permitting processes and Chamber of Commerce/Economic Development Coalition tentacles in this deal because of the way everything has been buried. Why is that?

5) Bottom line, how much do the citizens/taxpayers/residents/voters whom elected officials are supposed to be representing in this and other such deals really matter when our hard-earned money is being given away to billionaires by those we entrusted with it? What are the environmental toxins associated with these projects likely to do to our future health and well-being?

6) Lastly, there are many who favor this deal and will, perhaps, want others like it because they are blinded, made giddy by the glitzy bling of jobs, and our elected officials want to make their constituents happy. To them, let me say that maybe this deal works for you, but what about the next one that might not work so well? Don’t you want access to all the pertinent information? Don’t you want transparency?

Cynthia Heil is a retired federal noncriminal investigator who’s lived in Asheville for 21 years. For more background about the Pratt & Whitney project and Reject Raytheon Asheville, or to learn more about the group’s present and future plans, please check the group’s website at and our Facebook, Instagram and Twitter pages under RejectRaytheonAVL.



Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

11 thoughts on “Secrecy surrounding Pratt & Whitney deal raises critical issues

  1. Local Grandad

    For the moment, let’s ignore the writers’ mastery of journalism and research (Toxins? Labyrinth? Billionaires? Buried?) That’s some super cool fact based research!

    The Lightening article was clear, transparent, unbiased and quoted dozens of agencies across North Carolina. As were many many other articles laying out exactly how this and hundreds of these industry deals just like it work and benefit the community over time. The writer should read them again, slowly.

    In my last comment wasted on this subject – I would strongly encourage the writer to consider some empathy. We don’t consider jobs ‘bling’ in this town. Nor do I consider myself blinded by the value of a good job. I respect the value of a good job and growing our tax base. She may want to entertain the possibility that our elected leaders made a cogent decision that will bring the benefit of great jobs, pay, benefits, and educational advancement to local kids, families, residents and neighborhoods that don’t enjoy her economic privilege. That’s what I elect leaders to do.

    When you recognize the difference between fact and conspiracy – it is that simple. And that transparent.

    • Rachael Bliss

      Ms. Heil hit the nail on it’s head. I commend her thorough research in this matter. Most of us citizens were completely left out of this decision. County leaders like to make decisions in a vacuum. Even a letter from decision makers warned of political activists who would be opposed to this big deal. Thus the hush, hush. This wasn’t a fair fight at all. Check out the records on these companies, including environmental contamination in communities and rivers and aquifers, abrupt closures when better locations are found, and waste as these weapons manufacturers push products that the military can’t depend on. It’s all about the money. Anyone getting in the way will be labeled as party poopers or worse

    • North Asheville

      It was strange that the writer, who is opposed to the Pratt and Whitney deal, cited theHendersonville LIghtning article, which was an enthusiastic and thorough account of the many, many ways in which citizens and leaders at local and state levels were involved in the planning and executing of this project. She completely undermined her own position.

      • indy499

        I think that’s why Grandad suggested the poster read the Hendersonville article again. Slowly.

      • Anne Craig

        The article in the Hendersonville paper was the first time any of the public learned of the deal with Pratt and Whitney. That paper may have thought it was a good thing, but huge economic development projects such as this (or let’s call it industry recruitment) should not be made only by ‘leaders’ particularly when the ‘leaders’ agree to give millions in tax incentives, and infrastructure projects solely to benefit the industry (again our money) without citizens knowing anything about it.
        This is corporate welfare at its finest and government not ‘in the sunshine’ but deals ‘in the dark,’ The North Carolina statute that allows such deals to be made in secret needs to be changed. What are citizens and taxpayers getting for funding companies who profit from ‘endless war?’ Not much.
        Excellent commentary!

  2. Mike

    The letter sounds like “defund the military” and “defund the weapons industry” which makes as little sense as “defund the police”. But P&W doesn’t make weapons anyway. They make turbojet aircraft engines … BUT OMG those engines (which might power John F Kerry’s private jets) do spew CO2 in considerable volume.. Maybe that is the real objection?

    • Elsa Enstrom

      Their engine parts also go to the F-35 jet which is used by our military and also sold to other countries all over the world. Right now with civilian air travel still not back up to its original popularity this plant will mostly be making parts for military aircraft.

  3. indy499

    The author glosses over the fact that the county commissioners approved the deal. You know, the elected officials. I don’t think much of them, but if they didn’t thoroughly evaluate the deal they received “at the 11th hour” shame on them. Maybe elect some democrats. Oh wait, they are democrat dominated.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.