WCQS fundraising model needs some work

Asheville public radio station WCQS [recently conducted] another time-consuming on-air fund drive. I understand the station’s need to raise money, but can anyone name another nonprofit, other than a public radio or TV station, that raises funds by annoying their most avid supporters by depriving them, day after day, of the reason for their financial support — namely, excellent, uninterrupted programming? To me this is a bit like the National Wildlife Federation trying to raise funds by threatening to kill a wild animal every day until supporters contribute more money. Or the American Cancer Society threatening to hold off research for a cure until their supporters send in their checks.

WCQS claims that the use of their airwaves to reach contributors is the most cost-effective way of doing this, and most other public radio and TV stations use the same method. This may be true, but no other developed country on this planet that I know of employs this tactic for funding public broadcasting. Isn't it about time that we in the U.S. came up with a better way?
For example, why not charge the commercial broadcasters an annual license fee to use the public airwaves with the funds going to fund the public broadcasters?

— Fred Flaxman
Weaverville

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “WCQS fundraising model needs some work

  1. indy499

    Why should I pay (indirectly) for higher commercial broadcasting costs so you can enjoy free uninterrupted broadcasts?

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.