Which brings me to my point — after recently allotting Public Works with a bond issue to repair infrastructure, I’m in wonder that the response to the posed query [in the letter] regarding a tepid-at-best physical solution is no better than political doublespeak. Is this the best we can expect for our tax money?
— Margot Kornfeld Asheville
Thanks for reading through to the end…
We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.
We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to email@example.com
The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.
16 thoughts on “Letter: Is this the best we can expect for our tax money?”
I’m not sure why the outrage. True, the bond package was approved in November – but how long does it take to sell the bonds, put that money in the Public Works pipeline, run down the prioritized list of projects, etc.? It’s only been six months – Rome wasn’t re-built in a day.
LOL you mean all the tax increases and fees are being diverted to the connected? Like the RAD, art museum, tourism, and not to the actual residents? Once upon a time the city collected leaves. They stopped that and handed out bags. Now they do neither lulz.
you mean all the tax increases and fees are being diverted to the connected? Like the RAD, art museum, tourism, and not to the actual residents?
I didn’t say anything of the sort, obviously. Make things up much?
Don’t have to. Anyone can see for themselves. I dare say that decades of unchecked power and one sided elections are about over. Only so much money you can take before people wonder where it’s going. Local cronies are splitting up the city simply because one part is paying for the rest. And they ain’t happy lulz.
LOL and don’t forget the 300% increase in vehicle fees lulz. The city no longer serves the residents.
Bothwell will be along shortly to pump his park for the tourist. That residents will finance.
True. This bond is little more than a self-dealing re-election slush fund. They only have to spend it in areas where they can buy votes. Hence the opposition to district elections. And it frees up General Fund money they’ll need to pursue lawsuits.
What are you talking about, Tim? Please provide some data to back that nonsense assertion.
Why, I’m talking about a self-dealing re-election slush fund. They only have to spend it in areas where they can buy votes. Hence the opposition to district elections. And it frees up General Fund money they’ll need to pursue lawsuits.
City Council will hear a presentation on the progress of the bond-funded projects, and especially how to keep the public apprised of their progress, tomorrow Tuesday May 23rd.
LOL council will pretend to listen. But any entity that pushes bond debt after tax increases and bogus fees year over year is either grossly incompetent or corrupt.
…or being squeezed in a fiscal vise by the State. Reduced sales tax distribution, cutoff of business license fees, elimination of Sullivan Act transfers for road maintenance, etc. We’ve talked about this here many times over the past few years, but some people don’t seem to realize that the books have to balance. When the State takes revenue away, local municipalities have to decide whether to raise taxes, cut services, or borrow money (bonds). Welcome to reality.
Anyway, I just wanted the letter writer to know that the City is trying to keep us informed on the progress of the bond projects.
AVL is undoubtedly THE most pathetically run ‘city’ anywhere in America…AVL is an embarrassment to their inhabitants…
We SUFFER elected criminals running the pathetic city…
You have until July 21st to relieve us of this suffering, Fred Caudle.
Chris Peterson on the city budget