Letter: New approach needed, not manufacturing incentives

Graphic by Lori Deaton

The old vertically integrated industrial giants are gone, replaced by supply chains. And as a result, the transfer-pricing smoke and mirrors have gone as well, and we can begin to see where real profits are made. Some years ago, a Taiwanese take on this was that the potential for profits was concentrated at the ends of the supply chain (in R&D and product design, and in dealing with end customers ) with no room for profits in actually making things.

Apple’s cash mountain would seem to indicate that designing things and outsourcing their actual production can work very nicely, thank you. With manufacturing jobs leaving China over the last few years as the workers there have become too expensive, you would have to live with pay of $1-2 per hour to get lost factory jobs back.

In the midst of this, of course, the city and county are attempting to attract “advanced manufacturing” businesses. Businesses that, to even have a hope of competing globally, will be employing as few people as possible as cheaply as possible and replacing even those jobs with robots as fast as possible — whatever conditions are attached to the grants and incentives they are gifted. Using our tax money to compete with nearly every other city in the country to attract those companies is unlikely to end well.

If you are frightened of the future, seeing Western North Carolina promoted as “Silicon Mountain” will seem a stretch. But this isn’t about you. This is about trying to make a brighter future for our kids. Looking for creative businesses that don’t require raw materials to be shipped in and products to be shipped out means that we can minimize our greatest weakness while working on our strengths. In addition to a new approach to attracting businesses, we would need to build a whole new infrastructure — better educational opportunities for our kids, startup-friendly office space, more and bigger angel syndicates and venture capital funds just for a start.

If the rich folk feel that they are being unfairly excluded from the city’s future, here is their chance. The adventurous ones could invest in angel and VC funds while the more risk-averse could stick with their familiar property speculation and finance office buildings for startups.

Instead, of course, they scuttled off to Raleigh to find themselves a bunch of lickspittles willing to coerce the city into a gerrymandered Council and policies to further entrench our unsustainable economy with its starvation wages and property speculation.

Until the bubble bursts and we are left with just the starvation wages. And a $75 million debt to repay.

— Geoff Kemmish


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Letter: New approach needed, not manufacturing incentives

  1. bsummers

    I’m confused here – exactly when and how have “the rich folk” had reason to feel excluded from Asheville’s future?

    • Big Al

      He is assuming that most wealthy investors still seek the aforementioned “old vertically integrated industrial giants” and are unwilling to invest in new business models that might fit in post-industrial Asheville. This assumption is challenged by the fact that so much of Asheville’s housing has been taken up, and at increasingly inflated prices, which suggests that someone is investing in something that hires somebody other than minimum wage service industry workers.

      Whoever is lobbying for gerrymandered districts in Asheville, I doubt it is disenfranchised potential investors.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.