Letter: Today’s concerned citizens must stop The Bluffs

Graphic by Lori Deaton

One of my neighbors on Richmond Hill told me how, 25 years ago, concerned citizens joined forces to fight off an asphalt plant that was proposed for Riverside Drive. Can you imagine? Not far from where so many good things are happening now. Others tell how downtown Asheville was nearly leveled in 1980 and replaced with a massive shopping mall that would now be an obsolete eyesore and not at all who we are.

These stories remind me how mitigation and careful planning are so much less costly than retrofitting. What if those who came before us had allowed such atrocities?

These stories remind me that we do not simply live here; we are caretakers of this special place. Where (and for what) do you stand?

In all the discussions surrounding The Bluffs megadevelopment being proposed to wipe out a pristine forest next to Asheville’s Richmond Hill Park, I have not heard one intelligent/forward-thinking person voice support for this project or explain how dumping thousands of renters, along with congested traffic, guns and toilets, at the end Richmond Hill Drive — a heavily traveled road that has been denied speed humps due to fire safety concerns and sloping toward the third-oldest river in the world — will improve our city or quality of life. Traffic and environmental issues, along with living wages, infrastructure, public safety, generational wealth and our very existence, are all intertwined.

We’re at a critical moment. If we do not stop The Bluffs, we will have no one to blame but ourselves for the unraveling of all that we have stitched together over time. Few have crystalized it as well as Asheville’s own Wilma Dykeman in The French Broad:

“Dwellers of the French Broad country are learning an ancient lesson in all their resources: it is easy to destroy. Because the river belongs to everyone, it is the possession of no one. And as towns and villages grew, they dumped their trash. Filth is the price we pay for apathy.”

Aren’t you glad that there were wise and visionary activists before us who chose not to be apathetic? What will your legacy be?

We must protect our future and stop The Bluffs. In fact, the best use of Tourism Development Authority marketing dollars would be to buy the tract and put it into land conservation for future generations. What better/more focused advertising could there be than to position Asheville as a visionary city?

— Robert McGee

Editor’s note: This letter has been updated from the print version, which mentioned a June 24 public hearing on the matter. That hearing has been continued for 60 days, following a May decision by Woodfin’s Board of Commissioners that “updated the town’s code and dissolved the Planning and Zoning Board of Adjustment and created a Planning Board and separate Board of Adjustment, which is now taking up the issue,” according to the Asheville Citizen Times.



Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

6 thoughts on “Letter: Today’s concerned citizens must stop The Bluffs

  1. Enlightened Enigma

    More land conservation? With all these millions of acres of forest around us ? ROFLMAO! The need for better housing is clear in that part of town and this development will be as nice as any new residential housing can be I am sure! They won’t be cheap rent places either! Bring on the BLUFFS !

  2. LowerCrust

    Anti-housing rationalizations:

    – No new housing if it is within two miles of my current residence.
    – No new housing if any trees will be lost or disturbed.
    – No new housing if any existing structures will be lost or disturbed.
    – No new housing if the proposed structure(s) do not “fit in” with the surrounding area.
    – No new housing if it contributes to any higher density or more traffic than already exists.
    – No new housing if the land or existing structures can be in anyway argued to be “historic.”
    – No new housing if it might contribute to local population growth.
    – No new housing unless it is for low income (and even then, only if it is NIMBY, and abides by all of the other anti-housing rationalizations).

    Note: Use these randomly, in rotation, or in any combination, any time new housing is proposed.

  3. kw

    Actually, affordable housing is a complete fantasy and far too complex for the small minds in charge of things here. While I wish people could buy a charming bungalow for $100K and bicycle along the French Broad to a quaint downtown and eat a fine meal for $6, it’s just not going to happen in Asheville again. That part of our history is over.

    There are just 2 bullet-proof ways to acquire affordable housing: 1) purchase in a place where housing prices are low (this would include Asheville in 1996, but not Carmel, CA, in 1996) or 2) purchase a home where prices are lower than where you currently reside (this would be present-day Asheville if, say, you’re coming from New York or L.A.) To continually build more apartments will never help anyone achieve their dream if their dream is to own a home here. The best thing to do is to go find the next Asheville–that is, the Asheville of 25 years ago…

    So…let’s focus on the people who are already here and ensure that we’re not forfeiting our quality of life.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.