Letter writer: Can’t we have safety and tree preservation?

Graphic by Lori Deaton

Last week at Asheville’s George Washington Carver Park, four mature apple trees and a chestnut tree were cut down by the city without any communication with the park’s contractual partners or general notice to the public.

Apparently these cherished food-bearing trees are to be replaced by overhead lighting to address “safety concerns regarding camping and illicit activities.” Several more mature fruit and nut trees are at risk of being removed to complete this plan.

This destruction of public property completely contradicts the Food Action Plan, adopted by City Council in partnership with the Asheville-Buncombe Food Policy Council, and the value city residents place on public edibles. A recent petition to protect the fruit trees at the Montford Recreation Center generated nearly 1,000 signatures on Change.org. That was only a few months ago — apparently the city didn’t get the message?

It is completely possible to design a security lighting system that does not destroy the integrity of this space and that would not require the removal of trees. The current lighting plan is neither an effective way to deal with the serious issues Asheville faces around housing access and drug addiction, nor an appropriate management plan for one of the nation’s oldest edible parks. It is merely is the best Duke Power could offer, so of course the city took it.

Let’s have an open, public forum to generate some real, creative solutions, something the city appears incapable of doing, and let’s have some accountability, transparency and communication from our city government.

— John Buscarino
Barnardsville

SHARE
About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Letter writer: Can’t we have safety and tree preservation?

  1. Deplorable Infidel

    Awwhh…little Gordo must be crushed over this…sacrificing food for safety? say it ain’t so…

  2. Don

    In complete agreement here with John….. thanks for bringing this to our attention and YES, the cutting of those trees was another brainless and unnecessary act by the city for sure. As for the one comment left by the Infantile Infidel… dude, please crawl back under whatever rock you came out from … seriously, you’re ugliness is what you wear… we don’t need to be reminded of it and your unremitting bitterness.

  3. This “paper” should only publish letters on city matters from people who live here.

    Mr. Buscarino sitting in Barnardsville refers to “our” city government. Nope it isn’t yours. You don’t pay for it and apparently have little concern for the safety of citizens. A resident had to complain for a couple years to get action. Since Jesus wouldn’t be blessing and multiplying this fruit, this has an impact on food security as close to zero as is possible.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.