Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Brent Brown
Panelist Follow me @brebro

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Unlisted address

  1. Bright

    These people really have blown all the taxes collected “proactively” to address the water supply issues from years ago. Because of the “ loss” of those taxes Asheville will have big trouble this winter. These poseurs need to own up…taxpayers can forgive them once again, and the funds can perhaps be borrowed from the sports facility acquisitions. Water is a survival issue. No water, no tourists. Stock up.

  2. gyp

    It’s really unfortunate when the cartoonists for this paper appear to only have cursory understandings of the topics that they comment on, and as a result they spread misinformation.

    No one in any position of authority or intelligence has concluded that new construction was at fault for the water calamity last year. The problem was not a lack of overall supply. And new multifamily construction in particular is easier to service than single-family suburban sprawl, at least relative to the tax base that each kind of land use supports. And it’s the latter that has aging pipes that are more prone to bust. Unsustainability is baked into our land development practices of the past. BUT the land use development that we want to see more of today—density, infilll, etc—isn’t to blame, no matter that it makes an easy scapegoat for affluent baby boomers.

    • Hiram

      Would you rather have 30,000 without water during a weather event, or 60,000?

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.