Letter: More to the story of development approval

Graphic by Lori Deaton

I was disappointed with the Xpress’ report on the [Buncombe County Board of Adjustment] meeting to approve the Aiken Road apartment complex [“Board Approves 296-apartment Complex Off Aiken Road,” Dec. 20]. The article failed to mention the following:

1. In both meetings, the neighbors’ concerns were brushed aside. It appeared that a decision to approve the complex was a foregone conclusion, and the meetings were merely formalities.
2. The DOT study failed to take into consideration the fact that part of the traffic is routed through a private road and, therefore, potentially illegal!
3. The development is not in the character of the neighborhood.
4. The Board of Adjustment is composed of many members who may have a vested interest in the development (e.g., real estate agents). Additionally, they may not be qualified to make decisions about the environmental and local impact.
5. Both developments (Aiken Road apartments and [an adjacent development of 75 single-family units]) are controlled by the same developer and will have a stressful impact on this part of Reems Creek and its ecosystem.

While affordable housing is important, shoving developments through in a covert manner is not the way to present new housing solutions to the community at large.

More likely than not, these developments will result in maximum cost to the local residents, environment and end user, with maximum profit for the developer and owner.

— Rudy Beharrysingh

Editor’s note: We at Xpress agree that the issues surrounding the role of appointed boards like the Buncombe County Board of Adjustment in approving development projects are complex. That’s why we’ve increased our coverage of these issues over the past year, notably “Road Warriors: Buncombe Residents Call for Brake on Traffic Growth” in our Oct. 18 issue. The article Mr. Beharrysingh mentions does include comments from residents unhappy with the proposal and the attorney who is representing two neighbors. While we understand many residents were disappointed in the outcome of the board’s deliberations, we believe our story impartially reported on the main points raised at the meeting. We also covered the first time this project was discussed at the Board of Adjustment in “Apartments Stall, Townhomes Get Green Light” in the Nov. 15 Xpress. In addition, we have recently published several letters to the editor on this topic.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Letter: More to the story of development approval

  1. Enlightened Enigma

    yeah Rudy, it’s those ‘real estate agents’ otherwise licensed as Brokers in NC probably … had the neighborhood looked from within toward the future they could have possibly pooled their cash to
    purchase this sacred ground for a community land trust and thus ‘forever’ protected …

  2. Jason

    HAHA! “character of the neighborhood” give me a break. Next your going to say that increased traffic is going to be bad. You NIMBY’s need to come up with better arguments.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.